Re: [v6ops] State of play

otroan@employees.org Tue, 02 February 2016 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274FC1AC3CD; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:36:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QBLn0DqrxOkF; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:a000:17::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79221AC3CC; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36E3D7884; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:36:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=MseW3nzPW1TKnPG9gx8hJSGO+2o=; b= ENxSOrfYSmGAn+lGnJbviA7Ccfpoc2op1AVPlfodqBvyZKzQRwRtl8rhbH8lWIC4 LuZGaoE/NLYhPITivCq+MPpAFwUqcxxnlqoAUFvtOBSNXh4r3j7unpDTY00+byQ4 scd3vhcBkhUT9AkTFeZljqRBro8JNPkAlhQhoZ6dxYs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=jLevplR6VBrhWZmdhIFthXa3Tk RFzVzzJo4Hdsv/mdpwtCBVPGI13NXRBGhvu/1m60WMOQrnjT1eT3QklolS22h3j4 F3dmfDRrrENXf+YJD7PHZ9EGB3UEH/n1N8FsPdknvdEAb18vASVxoee++mu/ThY4 Y2fzXrEAOJt5pmRSo=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (unknown [173.38.220.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8376CD7882; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E65FC74D8; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:36:02 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_19273F70-E38D-4231-BB1C-CF5BDAE3F7EC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <20160202035520.9932E415A9C9@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:36:02 +0100
Message-Id: <FD36029E-14CD-40EC-9A59-68CDFE7DB56F@employees.org>
References: <201602011400.u11E0Hsd009385@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <20160201231151.25706414D77A@rock.dv.isc.org> <61DE78D0-8B8D-4BD3-B6B4-5275B118D6F5@cisco.com> <20160202035520.9932E415A9C9@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QeL_CG4hAUy0-uaHaPKuLkh-PBE>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:36:10 -0000

Mark,

>> When you say "v6man", I assume you mean "6man".
> 
> yep.
> 
>> I'm a little lost. I don't see the words "chair" or "question" in the =
>> draft. Could you be more specific about what your question is?
> 
> Which WG should take ownership of the problem space in this draft?

is this an implementation bug, specification bug or both?

Best regards,
Ole

> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> draft-andrews-tcp-and-ipv6-use-minmtu-04 has an open question directed
>>> at the v6man and v6ops chairs - should this be a v6man or v6ops?  It
>>> needs to be fixed and I don't care in which forum it gets done but it
>>> needs to be done.
>>> =20
>>> Mark
>>> =20
>>> In message <201602011400.u11E0Hsd009385@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>, =
>> fred@cisco.com writes:
>>>> RFC Editor: AUTH48
>>>> 	2015-11-23	draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption
>>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc
>>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
>>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam
>>>> =20
>>>> RFC Editor: In ISE Review
>>>> 	2016-01-20	draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
>>>> =20
>>>> IESG: AD Evaluation
>>>> 	2016-01-31	draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis
>>>> =20
>>>> IESG: In Last Call
>>>> 	2016-01-28	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world
>>>> =20
>>>> WG: Unupdated WG Document
>>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices
>>>> =20
>>>> WG: Updated WG Document
>>>> 	2016-01-21	draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>>>> 	2016-01-03	draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability
>>>> =20
>>>> Individual Submission: Unupdated
>>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-xu-v6ops-dslite-redundancy
>>>> 	2015-10-15	draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
>>>> 	2015-09-21	draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack
>>>> =20
>>>> Individual Submission: Updated
>>>> 	2016-01-05	draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost
>>>> 	2016-01-03	draft-xcf-v6ops-chinatelecom-deployment
>>>> 	2016-01-03	draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment
>>>> =20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> v6ops mailing list
>>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>> --
>>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>> 
>> 
>> --Apple-Mail=_99008B0B-2380-47D5-A518-D24FACDEAD89
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
>> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
>> Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> 
>> iQIVAwUBVrAnTkayAOS/EQ8MAQL9Ug//e/6aNfv+AC2Iv2qAp6MjcIYyRcqRZLew
>> hhXABkYFTk+/FPHe57xZ4W7h4eEpJ7L8Fha+M+tEzB1ydNc/n/3NsThP6iZCsIYE
>> lemKravU5zMVEvGLeWoaj9YUdKXzlqgIT6TjcE/0wuyUS6a5MotVMXqLKNkwbwg5
>> IIX1lZNeSWmc7dtWUIeh9/UzgzlGap9Nd0+MhQVoWvPXgNv4Xvq9AhFSOZsz3r1L
>> dtiOGn6cwypfrNleDt7D62jtWpmtyM/R7CjDBVhEhDVXyEiEt5/BfPnfB8e5+Ozt
>> +PvIPw7rPe3Y6tg37kZLTySOiHiJ0UDPCwk7B3KQtYlnfKjFmQ0w8aad+I9Gw7x6
>> FtUuMZZn5GDzkzR1dpBMr9J2KGjtwO7szDo8C/ZONEfwzTkXwepvxfZoW8eQuTIu
>> E09eFvtUmmpE5w3K9sU/8ku8h+rtNf85GO5rozDwGBlflZAnRHpE61UZZqHAenBm
>> HZIdLBxpZ56RQYzCN+ifrjR4ELTIfI0tUWVJSUWuW34hTpYfLFxWvi+BLLwnDbyC
>> brKIPmBtpks6HKctM/D4YBDiLC0/ZvvsmlWnzCX1ZxdkzZNm0Ah0rSvSP7I/wICA
>> x6tcJPMrUehuA13koaI++2SE7mI87wZb8DygbnxobCgwRwKJz2JgjATFPoV3Asyz
>> whJD47Pn2t8=
>> =0jdz
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> --Apple-Mail=_99008B0B-2380-47D5-A518-D24FACDEAD89--
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------