Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Thu, 24 October 2019 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F630120255 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tecuBltWJdSL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CABF1201EA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id z6so370239otb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OXUOEIVGuKNe7pZSlU65Cd/4DPQPlW4SiSdufEYHge0=; b=FPch/678Kf7C7d6KUtUH/rRBDheVW8y2RU/JnMhEcZDmUD60Ci9yZs5jZsG3ZZ0788 WBlMX5dddyM61NOk3qZthKJThVJn1zhSPMQvh7f/X91xXq97XHwugZf3ty7hBYxQnZ4z 8cTtmmsqUnj0XmpnNNdq0jAD/KZOzsfJC2HlO0mfL3SRiXusjAYGOJOx8CZ3SaPmz3y+ 5nXRF+gfU5Kw4xKw43eouuXI4FaSOIpGC+cj+9+xmESYVWh1KfdJJR3GA+l86H+W80Cf TL8cyWqoPshaFBMiwq8jd1Plmm9F7EFDErhWRfR7tfWjk70tP1pZlxkf+b71cs9Q17mX T2Xg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OXUOEIVGuKNe7pZSlU65Cd/4DPQPlW4SiSdufEYHge0=; b=qoBd/VzUXYZIJo4X9s3PmDfcet9glIWx4VwfpD1Elb71aHEAbM7g3meZ5D5Sd0mOb0 /ppNVS24LpDAXwhWh/IZZGRYozQ42REIG7FxniO3kiI1VbuF064fDy3bp8srLzqx+AMN P20l80aIA/Pc6CYliI9NXWxkLXHm6PzXwuYTV6M4JHN2wwrUPKscBMXtY4tZeM1p5LkY zaDcXTCVjLcRDUaFklcKiN09gmPuFBQul1QOsKCpEIVbMxxVd0UyIe9Ww0IsZvXC6Koa kRVUlNFbPu9q4LkvEeUUOiJZfAnikO3g+AcZi9XlPfvbvMdM+81KXrp7NtHcbpz8v8wV K9mA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpiRfxtdoPh5FAIZyzbw5rvK1LDWZui7BJJht3um9kPIy1XDl6 p2m5NriZkB7w0gUZPimV7qFDAcbXMd8k29n53L8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqykIInVcAgK98Ddv86YKRwM8VugXZy7Pd1uTq7rH5LEGXEw6gAhd8jv+euT835pK0FF8gTPsnaGCO0myYjIdRc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:43:: with SMTP id d3mr46898otp.153.1571953639909; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m1iNIFE-0000IwC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <d1b6855d-bde9-7b53-4809-0846bb9772e4@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2x7vudujw5t++obry56g=VNjQXXTHFK8pBPk0jmk78Bcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJoHkZ8pTjszP0vw4BjX0HUhmPa6wJONzdy2JEm5iqAfBUvjRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wCYi4KWTEz1hUSPVr9+hu8GaHRkPuvQQ2P00knvnPaaQ@mail.gmail.com> <848BA3B3-36B4-4C42-86D0-88759BC45D5A@employees.org> <A61279DA-4678-4A10-9117-6CA227AE2FA5@cisco.com> <4a6aa65f-bcfc-bc59-2789-9bec5c483a1a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4a6aa65f-bcfc-bc59-2789-9bec5c483a1a@gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:47:09 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xB9V3FN8a4WF2p8dxJyY5r+AHC80+spMOBQDVW9a7fCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f6ed60595aefa5b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QlaHEvngIh-RdwzFD8tcdzDY--8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:47:30 -0000

On Fri, 25 Oct 2019, 00:43 Alexandre Petrescu, <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Le 24/10/2019 à 15:11, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) a écrit :
> >  [...] "Unstable DHCP-PD prefix considered harmful" ?
>
> Risks being shortened to an as harmful 'DHCP-PD considered harmful'.
>

If you're going to suggest that, you better say why.

DHCPv6-PD has facilitated residential IPv6 deployment. There would have
been no practical way to do it otherwise.



> Alex
>
> >
> > -éric (enjoying my 3-year old /48 or is it 5 years?)
> >
> >
> > On 24/10/2019, 12:47, "v6ops on behalf of Ole Troan" <
> v6ops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> >
> >      Mark,
> >
> >      Right. Instant/flash renumbering is not supported in IP networks.
> >      IPv6 does nothing to help with this, well, assuming a network
> hiding behind NAT, it makes it harder.
> >      Apart from "does not work", what more can the IETF say or do here?
> >
> >      Cheers,
> >      Ole
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>