IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD48E131C4C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2O2TmFt22MGj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725E0131C45 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h134so44840051iof.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iNC3m2rohNg5TRLAIKZzZs/YSN9yC+9HDq6HjlFqP4o=; b=bVg8ZiCkg5yCJWM8ogFsCBUr/DdjTWnlcvuYfa5cINOjf3CNrj16bebtrSjVZUaq5N PGL9uAhvWqRKj1FnfnOP2v3pBKl9Ae6TXF2hzkvEkTvYjqbF5XpaUan4tBOuv0gnuvGu AT8Zh+hzccJA09VA8QIfkSnySgcLHUrOkoE/WA9OlRU2Dsn1cdJSF53xfEgPjyO3zL33 Oi3S3WIcscsZvEYFsR1mmAAhHOKZ/kNAMUU5Debvic1p3j8C38hPFeaRCrezArBsHyb1 11/kN1qOWM8pt5LzzkcW56HsmAb8Ve9BHUc7VPIJjMxYkhaAbglxHzDR16j0NmtoN37S luJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iNC3m2rohNg5TRLAIKZzZs/YSN9yC+9HDq6HjlFqP4o=; b=L7IUA58GFjdaoMODWJ9uEIVixcYN4eoDd3pypPa1679SkMqaMb3kllg4VmWbaxVO9q UFta0dolKN+t2Xj8RhZ1gcc/OBjLhX6hYh5riGPRhx+mlSi0NiI9jWQ0Co6UaE2Z5O12 TNHt7+3Vo5F+ny1D2nYRrCeJ3XuviHdj5TIjFeEzaLM75UHZ6uq2W9IMcqlidiVVjLz7 NQyFDECQzlsm7Hpl1Gg7ynSihJwg/Y+x7/v3OBeYZOkk70x0xdprofJ0udXBstDGx5ph nBXioD2F8tyDzUF+Hb1Honlp0ODFVLxQaM7ec7BHybNe3tmPPhiDHMKutIP1BwVjmDtM XWtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111wIua+dQGZNHRnvictPOo9elK3Z1YjkgOhB3fLSQ+QxRPX5Xki W8R/Azm/IVsou440c6h6vFTyuJ+/qrii
X-Received: by 10.107.137.161 with SMTP id t33mr19551165ioi.181.1500304122583; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.55.215 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1dX7DB-0000FzC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com> <A5D0385C-F755-4B44-86D8-6E618E77193F@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kroh2cPkTr8HRfNjLTdG0hkC1oQsUZdhQzQA5tA9-xug@mail.gmail.com> <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kU4cpVCsp7W3XNAZupYqjTWVH+BNp9bwtznnWD_uP2oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqgTWZzZW0wKggDXjY=-aMfDxzd5-GoRqju1829XwY3aHQuYg@mail.gmail.com> <0FAF1E05-DA4B-47BF-95F7-7EFCD1BED9B0@cable.comcast.com> <42188852-BBEB-4D75-967F-4BED79BBBCAE@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BARahTfH_Uy_t22EthGuFMJ=q-N1zxismNAVkHWWJA-Obw@mail.gmail.com> <CBA23B1B-C5A3-413C-B399-93F537C99015@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BARz_u92NweYkTizT2=q420sBRh11m9bqWO9+aexCi3ANA@mail.gmail.com> <2A639918-C6AC-44B8-8D66-5293EE13A7BD@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BASrxoroJVHwxFpwwBxCUC62_VZXsUGgfDOj6y+KVWk6tw@mail.gmail.com> <C510C095-B9AB-432F-A050-FD9CD640A6DE@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BAR413hwY_G2Cw-Ab+J158udPDLSFo==EN4LHjWb_YzD5Q@mail.gmail.com> <m1dX7DB-0000FzC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 01:08:21 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQ1ML2ARZKozJLFiEw43jmMObKwOpD4pGt9S3VKOwLE4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-7@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QqpOAoRigRRfcLyu3Xmagi278Ik>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:08:45 -0000

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Philip Homburg
<pch-v6ops-7@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> If we assume that home wifi networks will remain dual stack for the next
> couple of decades to support IPv4-only devices (the WAN link can be come
> IPv6-only but the CPE will offer dual stack on wifi one way or another).
>
> If we assume that most office wifi networks (and networks that connect measurement
> equipment, industrial controllers, etc.) will do the same, then why would
> we advocate that other wifi networks switch to a completely different way of
> providing IPv4 connectivity?

I find it quite amusing how almost any IPv6-related problem turns out
to be a chicken and egg one.
'Nobody is using this because it is broken. It is broken because
nobody is using it'..

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email