Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Warren Kumari <> Mon, 14 September 2020 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167053A0AFF for <>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpoFZ-XKmsdK for <>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F253A0AF1 for <>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id s205so539990lja.7 for <>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fHGsNei/Z0D9eDIFbcx/c557NtDq6NMJ0kdbheyahJY=; b=ER8Tq2cww04ldu4utbEwUkq7tLiV2/urFvGErpOKMHWKtkS0tks5a1L0+mENTEEaAP W4i9K+2yHaaZvAhIPryJ3iwWDTOPwo0my8vERjbzJnG63mc2itT+S/1TK+t9kRuWdZTy kYC8Vd0FrA1hST0x+kNfBAa193fhWJC2R4ki/xhfefLkecdtSSgs6b53q1YR8wA3VCfc /AFb6T/gEVfe9Erbf/tHgN8pLtwbZ89OvVPfp1b0ph/OA0Em4X2Nk3WjIx+YpdL24VYW qv+lRH90jCzV7RY6tJK9cnwdim4myz6RY3eyhAoUHfRrKjNzWpMGl/a42z7bwLdP+/kw /68w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fHGsNei/Z0D9eDIFbcx/c557NtDq6NMJ0kdbheyahJY=; b=FT9rdOIEzINhCg5WQtnTGUeVM2Z0ubPxTDEExkCKDs9zmRt2ACRrql+klYKrAC8w7K QBggeTec4DflLCo4ttB8vPO/mwAkzY8ovt+hVWbg5sk2D5uczd3DGcdngv+eXjM+Av0T T9xzpenVkvhu9yixhM57K3YZ/UAAAy0n7kqnUfkM0ictFaObsDTzB/Wm3b50BEtM+cey ZzOpY2Oo2mI52Sr4EMDKzFd50jnz8M9XgZmgvmU6VVSs95Vo2LMo8Mcsj3LsjNQd6n/u sU9sfGVvA4GL1Q7Ltm338jscY/3ae29Tws6XvI2ARgLHrvprFPKmM9ouC2FeYZKBiYK5 1DTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SUu3XT58PFRIx0UpdBLhBdmEEHzpkHjvUiUJSvvZkDyZHZRUq n9PcclAsg3G9XOBiKrTV5WpXO3XbXkaw33kvW3Uqs6ofvZLKLNBn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyi90DHcgfJX0qdT16u2zLyJhiKeYhFIMQHt6SbCeii/3tVlJ9m3iVl4GJKf/xw00laAWnQz9RLsO05MqtE4YI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b99:: with SMTP id z25mr5882103lji.403.1600108478837; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <VI1P194MB0285090A6E66464C9612EE34AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <> <VI1P194MB0285F92EB7A41638CCD943BFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <> <VI1P194MB02850F23AF935024E5281F15AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <> <VI1P194MB0285958CAA801F8C915B81D0AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <> <VI1P194MB02857724058D5192BD8E3BADAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200914182548.GZ2485@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20200914182548.GZ2485@Space.Net>
From: Warren Kumari <>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:34:01 -0400
Message-ID: <>
To: Gert Doering <>
Cc: Khaled Omar <>, "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007bce3805af4a4956"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:34:43 -0000

This thread started off with one of the chairs making it clear that they
didn't believe that this was in charter, and asking which WG you were
discussing it in.
Fred then made it even more explicit: "Let me make this clear: we are
working on Ipv6 deployment, not deployment of alternatives or transition
technologies."..."Your proposed protocol doesn’t fit v6ops’ charter.
Therefore, no, you don’t get air time."

I believe that this conversation is off-topic and disruptive, and note that
RFC3934 gives WG chairs the authority to temporarily suspend the posting
privileges of disruptive individuals without IESG approval.


On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:26 PM Gert Doering <> wrote:

> Hi,
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:07:37PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
> > Since I've been working with many nationalities (like Australians,
> Deutsch, Egyptians, and many more) and after a good time I can say that it
> is a matter of choice to choose the people you need to work with, that???s
> why I say who is interested, can join the discussion and the
> standardization process and will gain more experience.
> Please find all these nice people, work with them on IPv10, come back
> when you have a host and a router implementation.
> Until then, let us do the work needed to move IPv6 onwards, and make
> IPv4 obsolete one day.
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list

I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of