IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 25 September 2020 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724213A0365 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbRGVqKhXsOl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66553A11C8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1601016646; x=1632552646; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=AIcStNb4IvVTpuUrV9VkUVAcC8Xy03YTnp98ZLDwNdw=; b=b7BzsqC5p/tfBMDtBAmdQ+cgwe5B0jyOpTodidebEtWslWYLNXKZMJiN xLBnNurr/0cJCfBVvjpEZfWJwVRUtR8cLhe4R6TnuNrn2jLrqppXlDa65 KIJxO66ve+bY0pwjq1xsZLc5VQw9M3ZeZNE33w9BVjilULQUSTBbcwWGm bfgTVcvKvPimd5X4Rd07MDEtWoakkpvaoXRTgoeH/Hd117dqvk2tcvXkN e0wbHWYiVaJQXR0ScZ/KcoE/ZleT6mycJUfBxIfKeCNqKPIKu3zhhPFWA gKTxiOCO9sIoqVs1yqhs5JtxDrAqY9PCo7e4M8Vy89FnSisnsxFS8603i w==;
IronPort-SDR: Rn2jmtmyo+m2p9YY1IBGVip8sNVdCGKzOq8hJ1Cka8J9m5poXUyrVqk9eSwoGKlxTDqnTGxb7l Vs0K0sxyYjB2pXwaVQl2Aa/DiXvF97EoAQiaGfX6KOOhs+ZxqYfRjmtpYDdLW3X+i8VCA3GXf/ Ofg3vKHGscy2RRIbdsGc3BwcfJDDpXR10CjR4qjEJ99Q/OhwLsu/r7eSNSuI2PkIFf+2se+gyj tg8VXL4m4fFHOtrf5lRBkri10Ex9WNrDF2UZb5S+4YPQOALrCfPEAgkEqhe0Wj7Jkc2ZEOqfNs gHk=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Sep 2020 08:50:39 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE7F41D16 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81AB41CFB; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id D19B4C91F8; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:50:38 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200925065038.GP2485@Space.Net>
References: <VI1P194MB0285F47132384AC7C0D8A8DCAE3C0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <F2516A37-06B1-44FC-850F-307114B7D6A5@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285B8AE9ACE88D1AF051ADAAE3A0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <601FB9F8-DB83-4654-B652-BE07C49F7918@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285D67301646D4383320B55AE390@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285D67301646D4383320B55AE390@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/RK1_0SpZFyKnvsv07HunNCLkulw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:50:48 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:59:25PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
> As you know from the IPv10 I-D, it requires the network between hosts to be IPv4/IPv6 ready, so it still can be considered, as I still think that the movement to IPv6 still need some time and arrangement to get the best result for the coming generations.

The transit networks are all ready today.  If IPv6 is not available, it's 
the endpoints or the applications.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email