Re: [v6ops] Status of CLAT implementation on iPhone? (IPv4 apps on IPv6-only PDP type)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 10 June 2015 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8A41B2A35 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cMpq8venOBMc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BA11A0046 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oihb142 with SMTP id b142so32505133oih.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=xDRpV1Cpx8p3DxVLPHbzGMCSqdBVke3mxS4MG2QvCrA=; b=VNQYfn0rdFUF3xTu0CjbVzt7a6onDfy198orqSZcy1dbPJSy6VADDhlbtVc4h566Bn XMXJmVjwy18Z6HhGjQGvwRU/mTOd4keDcHyQvUYmGOqmGTgawqPf4HANucPZexQpCDzx g1lSkkxrt24RWglm6RQrYSKcfk8WxOCeBydnfBSchYEUY3/vVVjFSuI+v5O0KnOeruXH 8JpiZo3U0tSqOYUGAjcXuxafI1VV8rq5b5EXImHM47J43eub3XZBA9jHjQgwA8ZuUqqu jlz1QGkTkr/WZyRq3eR1Rd5xzv4ObT5f+MyLhnMljhCDqcdAtrQ9F3ZL28+SGoAPZbDQ +igQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=xDRpV1Cpx8p3DxVLPHbzGMCSqdBVke3mxS4MG2QvCrA=; b=SIR7F5cZipl0kgENx+77FlUTxiWB4AxpgfOQlJ7nx6oSPWcgqOFRomayqbqnnIsVu3 ufGOCo2xwvrHRpqDzt8yPsdwtli71IngOViFHN13hmjqXASzRskWlre+VqXJ5RTU5RuG OxXEsizpQzGo2+ZvTb86lqey1BCqtY0hxp2lCYYz5mk1e6xStDOVHlWsy/cr6Kmz5hMb iC0NcskASNWBqkcuXSW9hmB9eYzo2AprB1pnI4vmxQGKClErKogvF8vnVfkSbtEAYwo0 sxwzZfOGb2pnQaX78y8Miv+c8VOQQlhyIKpnajmeiKXfRGymwnMBZGxo/Q8PJJvX1acK Q9TQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlG5vaBg8OerH6Agg4PXlOu+10nIg3xV59EDzM8sEbuqj1ZHdNKWhVMmtdyM2Rdt0EZzplb
X-Received: by 10.202.61.70 with SMTP id k67mr2880930oia.88.1433944426496; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.134.198 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55784065.20208@gmail.com>
References: <54EB1F2F.4000604@gmail.com> <CADhXe503xgpB6cGZC9aVozo+prmQEJ_8w7ELu456na=_ULSMCQ@mail.gmail.com> <557835FE.1020800@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506101522420.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <55784065.20208@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:53:25 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1+rfR-JqXOEXunJZuEpNztAZ4Smq4e1rbN_RscGppT3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cd5222b6b5005182a3435
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/RP3X3V8uYg4Wp007Ll_KSYffwsU>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Status of CLAT implementation on iPhone? (IPv4 apps on IPv6-only PDP type)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:53:48 -0000

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Would that use ULAs inside the IPv6-only  WiFi?
>
> Would it use IPv6 NAT?
>
> I couldn't see otherwise.


It doesn't need to do IPv6 NAT (and it can't, unless it has an IPv6
upstream). It only needs to do NAT64.