Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

["Liubing (Leo)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lee,

Thanks for the note. Their reviews will definitely help.

Btw, if it is possible, can you help to change the draft identity from "draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations" to " draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations"? I think it is good to align with the draft's title, and more important, it could avoid unnecessary confusion of this work's intent. 
Many thanks for your help.

Best regards,
Bing

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Howard, Lee
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 9:49 AM
To: Victor Kuarsingh; 'IPv6 Operations'
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

I see interest from Victor Kuarsingh, David Farmer, Alexandre Petrescu, and Brian Carpenter. Can I ask each of you to do a review of the current document, and send comments to the mailing list?  That will give the authors and the WG something to work from.

Following that, we can discuss whether we need additional discussion at a meeting, or WGLC.

Thanks,

Lee


On 11/3/15, 9:20 AM, "Victor Kuarsingh" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>WG,
>
>My input is that we should continue this work.  Given ULAs are already 
>in use, having a document which outlines those use cases is, in my 
>mind, operationally beneficial.
>
>Perhaps we should be more clear that we would not be recommending the 
>use of ULAs, but keep to a unbiased document which outlines how they 
>have been used (just a use case discussion).  We can also include 
>objective technical points as to the pros/cons related to each use case.
>
>It was also noted in another email (based on WG v6ops discussion 
>yesterday), that one such valid example was Cable Modem management IPs 
>assigned ULA based addressing.  This is a valid technical use case.
>
>I am willing to help if required on this document.
>
>regards,
>
>Victor K
>
>On 2015-11-02 6:17 PM, Howard, Lee wrote:
>> This document hasn¹t had any revisions or discussion in a while.
>> Is there anyone interested in working on it?
>>
>> If we do not hear any interest, we will abandon this draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lee
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
>>proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject 
>>to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended 
>>solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
>>If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby 
>>notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action 
>>taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is 
>>strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
>>E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently 
>>delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>


________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops