Re: [v6ops] Call For Adoption: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

[Nick Hilliard <[e-mail]>]

Giuseppe Fioccola wrote on 08/06/2021 16:41:
> [GF]: I agree that the document needs to be improved but I disagree
> that this is not in scope of V6OPS WG.

The issue is not whether the content area is in scope for v6ops (clearly 
it is), just that there were enough fundamental problems with the 
structure and content of the document such that it isn't appropriate for 
adoption at the moment.  Specifically, 1. there seem to be three main 
strands in the document which don't fit together well, and 2. there's no 
beginning, middle and end to the document - after reading the document, 
I didn't have a clear picture of what it was trying to say.

I can't see a way of fixing this without complete restructuring from the 
beginning.  Maybe the individual strands could be made to work as 
standalone documents?  Possibly if the document started out with a 
formal design and was rewritten from scratch to fit inside this design, 
it would become more cohesive?  Either way, these are issues that need 
to be sorted before the document is adopted rather than after.

Nick