IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz> Wed, 06 January 2021 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@helix.net.nz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3053A0800 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:46:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bLp8qJdvampP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1313A07EA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 04:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id r9so2583663ioo.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:46:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xt+DFGaVFCABlwXAJA9vbnTxHsQdfnWceh+GcUIyTeE=; b=1z9JA0aoSuQX5dsOuOm92qouVykl7KixTA3fWSiGO5OuVBDiXyi+U3Z+slL7DlPytW YeHxHd4K7e1WrbsljF/OAPQgXcsVma9bP23c3XjdGDLK9qX1+aa1PijqJXL0B2njqHpz peZyyhmMiwN4eOnz1iZzfxEag2Tea4FdvNYqFFCGdlzzXgDNDK66ogUGvFj+EDE1n4S7 TxWGRo2iHGXv2szThRQPITdmjT4BWZ/u59V6cxgeaniRqZf8+qAtTHpQs6qEI1y9dJkt oRqvrYtOg/8ltIDI+Fa6eVq6nhWyx5kXB6b0kDkbHIby2Khl5/fgnZyHq34Bijv+Y+wC 9WuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xt+DFGaVFCABlwXAJA9vbnTxHsQdfnWceh+GcUIyTeE=; b=V6Sy1Iopof9DQCfdG567ETDdv1vwQmqu615c71bvabcVxMHIGvdEeSCiKi6cYMzD3g B0cZnvB45hdg4jGKfByVoz8fPEq1lA/ywmzYLV7yHQT64zZwUXz9SrWfxSZlra/L/d+2 54yW7SA7gXxbHWjyk6JHo3CAFgbPub3YeE5z3qMHAcCMnrO1QW9QvygplDwqprAirI0t 4brTJUnXAdQLB4lP95VvBcrovuT0G+vi5pQj9OZy2j7lcscITLvX41Z6Ydmthj9O/uRO POCBJbC8WRD+8KCrX94uQvoJn0OiSFc4Gyo3qisDY17v9i4aTvYbTemf+1xNFj7qeeCo SC8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319s3M/ckf+q1XyZ8dbvgh3GwH4SdL1mM4IkbYMumGHUvLmtBOW we/gcX9ZVefUq4fxS0sMPe5BrKtz87ibwg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAa7Kvh+nHS0cPCplnRaoSowOFq4QnPSN86oxXEzl5QzTYeayQzC6O54xAhT8aRQLDfFufdw==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:778f:: with SMTP id g137mr207980jac.41.1609937204153; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com. [209.85.166.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s17sm1850265ilj.25.2021.01.06.04.46.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id u26so2602752iof.3; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:46:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b5d2:: with SMTP id e201mr2630790iof.111.1609937202742; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:46:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160989494094.6024.7402128068704112703@ietfa.amsl.com> <6fe3a45e-de65-9f88-808d-ea7e2abdcd16@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2wR-3vbHi-NrBBMmCTNDq5fgqvSmBUbYK7P+63QTNfxkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr014PzVJj9Y6O=PBGc_QSVtur-0wMpaNkFA0dqr8FHGuA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZA4y+9bdvzq5r4V=B6580ZnsdwYyvQ4nzjdeccMsM4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZA4y+9bdvzq5r4V=B6580ZnsdwYyvQ4nzjdeccMsM4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:46:31 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHL_VyCmYQ_X9FckY0Fem2Cq-zaDQ6e=WPxsHJP6LXKGksnU6A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL_VyCmYQ_X9FckY0Fem2Cq-zaDQ6e=WPxsHJP6LXKGksnU6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001489b805b83ab735"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/RSlwRpC6nxSkGu4nSZTOR4oRzb4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:46:47 -0000

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 07:31, Christopher Morrow <
christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> option 4, deprecate ULA.
> the best option (tm).
>

Strongly disagree.
I think defining a new scope for ULA is a good idea and will help to
demystify and improve their use in the real world.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email