Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Tue, 21 February 2012 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFA621F87D7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:46:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.94
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.94 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.659, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3azgMeJhm4zO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480B221F85AE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:46:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=968; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1329846411; x=1331056011; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=2RZ84dgFTrrTeNsprAi35ICrvR14+DGQMQRudXT6dnA=; b=l+QnPnKlLatrIElPPYY/GxVY1xnjQH0yuwcDddtiTWvUFof92/RZtmcQ TjfYgNbfu5zZHtDulSMis7ztGMWo7MSvlhj35aaCMUyr/bphpwX9rF/ls CgoAfLwqNXrqlJRTd4tjvjq27okcMZ52huYXgLmtN0LjgkA64gJqTobLA w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAFXXQ0+tJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABDskeBB4FzAQEBBBIBHQpLBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgFFCQgBAQQBEggaqAQBlyyLdhoVOgMDAoZ1YwSIT591
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,458,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="60658918"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2012 17:46:51 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com [72.163.62.200]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1LHkoFl030439; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:46:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:50 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:48 -0600
Message-ID: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C304076437@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F43A296.2070207@viagenie.ca>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AczwoK+uB16NN03URDWj/g12p79TIAAH7rVw
References: "29 Jan 2012 09:51:52PST."<85BE2EBF-C8AC-45E1-BF93-1E3066AD3172@apple.com><201201301936.q0UJaEft000156@givry.fdupont.fr><2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025B49@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com><4A687585-399D-4077-91AC-A1DC4F101E03@apple.com><2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025BFE@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com><30931DE1-9E57-4296-B0FE-FA98F840D78F@apple.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3040761AD@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <4F43A296.2070207@viagenie.ca>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2012 17:46:50.0999 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA941070:01CCF0C0]
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:46:55 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Simon Perreault
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 8:57 AM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis


>OS support is almost irrelevant. Applications today do UPnP and NAT-PMP

>without OS support. They just send the packets themselves, using 
>UPnP/NAT-PMP in a third-party (often open source) library. I would 
>expect the same for PCP.

>Applications evolve much faster than the IETF is accustomed to. You 
>could wake up one day to one or two new open source PCP libraries, and 
>then wake up the next with the major BitTorrent apps supporting PCP,
and 
>then everything else follows (games, etc.).

The other reason is that the LAN behavior of a CPE router is under the
homenet WG charter for over one year back.  Rfc6204bis stays away from
any new LAN behavior for the CPE router.

Hemant