[v6ops] AD review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 18 August 2020 20:08 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1063A0A7B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ylf9nvJ6oZZE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC993A09DA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t6so22826447ljk.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Mz41dLpNA9W4WChiTGKa42pNRCtcf0y7s9fgC3bd9/M=; b=xHWzAojPU+XNxMsI6YYnbdUzUKjxEKaGzcTx0mgnOdUzWk6OnPT8qJonTqIKkZDSDM VMN2BAbcFyx0YYqmMDm6OuLcWKZfmqUQp/AZXQb1e/ujVeoZu2wytS2ZdxOSbxLHaFxL D8fvVQMVXCrA1d0WBuGoaHlfcG2MCNNszeXuNW+tMbip6tZ/seoU8Kw0Bw6bUXBtaVy7 J1bm/+DJ0XfkShbCwTlAFKKJv+A4X4tdti7P/k0rJzKPCgFkH0Rcn1rVxceWN/Ym/ySt R7NuYUPKwB6XhomR106ZYEbx2H2sqKVNr1JnvFvuXiE98qnxIBQAzFmM4QOOMMejRC4d +guA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Mz41dLpNA9W4WChiTGKa42pNRCtcf0y7s9fgC3bd9/M=; b=NjcZNUQ3UYr+KUQM9TD8uxVnYMlxvB+FqqDT67RMj5yYLi7yTyxWs2H74xSdLJetUE lkqWyf7+YwXbTut/pov6qd0dZqKYv07DYjo+AIL9gwzuD5S+HvgkE9dnj1gcUIup1b3T X3nw8tNvxZ+Lm22Jd1wd7VRfHjKzaaExlaurcPozZuTzpCPdeiuw+8abAn+PxRJbJcqc e/zGRBbfVkAk7Tu4RaMwYhgVeh9MpiUs6hOTu8hP+MAxv8jX9qG3ZA3aVDPj7bCioex8 pU/iQhab+nZoRHrK3ansaf/2Aa4M5GNbimgvpwFFR/N+nPGGBtoyBbg7SvX40AhxPpJJ iUPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EqW6/D/II1VmIpgKiFGtVGOpG23zQwy6xf8GsjCB29f8FJygb CPMe1Q3JBaHSBImY7Zy0Mh9F4Nt5FKBiqOaDDuvFtw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQvf7bIjJk3ANEa3K8lqbLw0ocqSAPESXc42PeojGgIa0No4/tuVD0W3wCF/2KtAeiSobB8cLegUycPypkpZU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8ed4:: with SMTP id e20mr7856978ljl.403.1597781302368; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:07:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLVDU4LhhaH_8cVp_Ytp+KntNvErPRmodQbtmUqQ5Y1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.all@ietf.org, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SDW9okxLon5ujFR5qZGFzKFr1Yk>
Subject: [v6ops] AD review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 20:08:27 -0000
Hi there authors and WG, Thank you for this document - it is clear, useful, and addresses a real issue... I do have some nits that I'd like addressed before starting IETF LC... O: The lifetime values of prefixes advertised on the LAN-side via SLAAC must be dynamically updated (rather than static values), since otherwise the advertised lifetimes would eventually span past the DHCPv6-PD lifetimes. P: The lifetime values of prefixes advertised on the LAN-side via SLAAC must be dynamically updated (rather than static values), otherwise the advertised lifetimes would eventually span past the DHCPv6-PD lifetimes. C: Dropped 'since' - unnecessary and makes the sentence harder to parse. O: This document RECOMMENDS that CE router set the Router P: This document RECOMMENDS that CE routers set the Router O: The Valid Lifetime and Preferred Lifetime of PIOs have direct impact on three different aspect P: The Valid Lifetime and Preferred Lifetime of PIOs have A direct impact on three different aspects (x2) O: for at least the WAN-side DHCPv6-PD valid-lifetime, or for period of ND_VALID_LIMIT P: for at least the WAN-side DHCPv6-PD valid-lifetime, or for A period of ND_VALID_LIMIT (Multiple occurrences) O: Initiate sending Reconfigure messages (if possible - i.e., client requests Reconfigure support and the CE Router offers it) to the those clients with address assignments P: Initiate sending Reconfigure messages (if possible - i.e., client requests Reconfigure support and the CE Router offers it) to those clients with address assignments C: Extra 'the' O: However, there are a number of scenarios that may lead to the so-called "flash-renumbering" events, where the prefix being employed on a network suddenly becomes invalid and replaced by a new prefix [I-D.ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum]. P: However, a number of scenarios may lead to the so-called "flash-renumbering" events, where the prefix being employed on a network suddenly becomes invalid and replaced by a new prefix [I-D.ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum]. C: Readability. O: One of such scenarios is that in which a DHCPv6 server employs dynamic prefixes, and the Customer Edge Router crashes and reboots. P: One such scenario is when a DHCPv6 server employs dynamic prefixes and the Customer Edge Router crashes and reboots. O: ... comments that has benefited his protocol-related work. P: ... comments that have benefited his protocol-related work. ---- Please SHOUT LOUDLY once you've had a chance to address these -- I'd like to kick off the IETF LC for this and and draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum at the same time... W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
- Re: [v6ops] AD review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-sla… Fernando Gont
- [v6ops] AD review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-r… Warren Kumari