IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CA31B3DD7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:16:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhjPW9H-HZwp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F2E1B3DD5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykfs79 with SMTP id s79so122038653ykf.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:16:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lQLlbZ7oIz5ap9zFiV6bPBUL8jI2yd3aKfock9QD/6c=; b=QU5n0jorveQpeBQ0yqheykvvvnTIC7mLzlPrsJGWo580jNnCWYEOpV5RSTnyF+UEQ2 Aui0Bmd01j7VebfdA/+DIfKGaFlMlxfEAsBNa8R3N3llFEatIG0qMs0UeLJ78ZQ708k8 JJSuqRDg0KAkxbShUFGBefOLcFobgUnUtqhkbXb/+rlXL7Prq94jhb8j4xzYc142dOV0 N9JbisAAVKmkcrZBZEUiXTVOHm5H92BBdmRJY9w5BvG87Y3qnMFOsnpE8hxpTA4pUpKq U7yS+5NHQNZf5BTCJNyL+jy5S3eeylRk21HbKhfgaEZduVKu/kke52uPEICyFlqGHkwu iJqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lQLlbZ7oIz5ap9zFiV6bPBUL8jI2yd3aKfock9QD/6c=; b=RSFqvcWbydthkvaaNHHq89hJfVceZUK2oxdCxA/m4C4gi+DXeSwve7zC6E/WaBQJJM YjKoqYLO+1SybEZpzqSUiGtmWS7hzdMEPeld8m5OJvmAQc6eNxdDei/iZ/UefpTdB0VA Xz6NtgMUn0koTn2X68/VLDzUxwV+LEl5KMQbP9E73r6MJlfm9xI5lO/kFZWP3M5jqIw/ TPl7rg/54VhSY1r40JgOywxO0qwbXbF9ZYTyPFLGSNx4lCITHiH2oCytnc+00pJKOTD8 aKeI467f5WDQXVtfkMd+W1mRfMhrtjIiqE0tzK6uZm9YLAc52zuNd+m4ePEt/WhG8oLw WtHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsRzTzuQfXBMszYRGLa9FPshSlrGu5tZjfaehbdUbN7mx3sI8tT6hLYKQTIP3+/9ngcc9D
X-Received: by 10.13.204.2 with SMTP id o2mr14252646ywd.160.1447373761785; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:16:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.115.131 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:15:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151112214819.4EDE63C98D83@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net> <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAO42Z2x3O8A1XKqN3PTcvM=xpF8W_WNSL1rVhHQ4ZY5HbVG=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151106.081425.74651560.sthaug@nethelp.no> <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com> <20151112184613.GZ89490@Space.Net> <03C04D1B-86D1-4A5A-A8D3-7508CEC80DE9@delong.com> <20151112194327.GA89490@Space.Net> <95BC3D07-EF27-45A9-A1E0-12F9B43061C7@delong.com> <20151112214819.4EDE63C98D83@rock.dv.isc.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:15:42 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1jA_PKcjc7tiC9VhQ9yFM=SRzF6fc+fUzk89Jtb4Bvww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f136aee2b49052460f612"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SItvUA27gAkdeVsafzZzzSuPLLY>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:16:04 -0000

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> And how many SME's are there in the world?  This paper [1] puts the
> number at 125M MSME world wide.  That's 125M routing slots if
> everyone gets a /48.
>

I doubt that all but a small fraction of those SMEs actually need
multihoming. But even for those that do - we should be working on making it
possible to multihome using src+dst routing, not NPT66 or NAT66.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email