IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IETF 79 Meeting minutes - Draft

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Tue, 16 November 2010 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295963A6A73 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:19:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4onJqWf3eWzd for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBB83A68D0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 04:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:5128:225:ff:fe4b:94a8] (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:5128:225:ff:fe4b:94a8]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2228D308528; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:20:26 -0200 (UYST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20101116.202916.337815455.kato@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:20:25 -0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9222B727-7F0C-4A73-BEAB-41EA3725E9EC@lacnic.net>
References: <4CDF62F4.50308@bogus.com> <20101116.202916.337815455.kato@wide.ad.jp>
To: Akira Kato <kato@wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 79 Meeting minutes - Draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:19:56 -0000

Akira,

	Would it be worthy to see a CDF of the data of 10/8 and 172.16/12?

	Also, are you publishing this plot in a blog or something? It would be good as a reference for the future.

Best wishes,
.as
	

On 16 Nov 2010, at 09:29, Akira Kato wrote:

> 
> In Beijing Meeting, there were some discussion on how RFC1918 space
> was used.
> 
> I counted 29 million DNS PTR queries of one of the AS112 servers for
> 39.5hours in Nov 15-16, 2010 and plot the frequency in each /16 chunk
> (Red: 10.0.0.0/8, Green: 172.16.0.0/12, Blue: 192.168.0.0/16).
> 
> Asssuming these PTR queries were generated and leaked to the AS112
> server based on the real usage, we may conclude that entire space are
> in use while degree varies by the address.
> 
> -- Akira Kato
> <rfc1918.png>_______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email