Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Gert Doering <> Tue, 16 February 2021 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B193A0BC2 for <>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cL-Q0xQ16fIP for <>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664E83A0B20 for <>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;;; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1613492439; x=1645028439; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bdRvOFzFbUVdp+cA+XVpEOGNgLY4PPe561PcKfTSf2Q=; b=CUf/Cf2kMi0BG0iQxl+fmWcYP6eO84Au7srXqSFkLSeQ2gYVD1cpHcwF sTfy/alwrfWq12TIA7UrQojFQwes8cg1RUkvbpl0ixOMVSW4w/oH7Opmv 2zxuJxofXzD+y7zHB7PQ/5FjyGgFYZn7Ea8Lspro1t2SJz8VaUwmFRr3E E/gtAtf62TpltIbRUXTlyoeFawwswah5n9o0hWkKaj/6K18CrfFPWhQKy SLMuCxU+NiEhvDf26BKtvDoCR89GRxTRc4slsDaITkL2t9JVnbwFuPrMT qEf/isKm1z25WkKI2SXIQTx6pzuRYa7jbEhy2G7fT42HSVKsY9FI4jK0B g==;
IronPort-SDR: efEtwCj29ryBQOb0ZXAlNvA/zcy3XGO0K1NkTQlDpLvW+be9KwCro/UDgwNgbq/HkwpDfPaHRm CT4Hr9yov0fpezMLMJgP/1xF26PyGAyQAkBgHDqcVbNnge4hRYkAaCZPOLAg6knANIONN5jm6b 3qJbIgT31ZQVQtNQzNJCQ3X4vvzbFm5yA7kDtLpYMpLWT8JqfiA13rhwbFg0oxkt88JbbHSlrB 5+eKxTbNyLtYEiQmUyZIhakoYqhzpbFnZxdz6PjZLnDKe6Ukwn9VdtcoLppFQos/2ofx5JrgNR AjY=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2021 17:20:36 +0100
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C6B43B82 for <>; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:20:36 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C31C43B80; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:20:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 95ABEF75F1; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:20:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:20:36 +0100
From: Gert Doering <>
To: Ted Lemon <>
Cc: Gert Doering <>, Philip Homburg <>, Fernando Gont <>,, "" <>
Message-ID: <YCvw1DC/eOKmoEYc@Space.Net>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <YCvkYXwTrSdQoe8Q@Space.Net> <> <YCvsVVkQc5zDJQVh@Space.Net> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fxNuF1gV/RHOGqIP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] Re: Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:20:48 -0000


On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:06:59AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 11:01 AM, Gert Doering <> wrote:
> > I cannot comment this in any way that is not full of negativism about
> > the achievements of IETF work in the area of SoHo multihoming.  Sorry.
> Actually, RFC 8028 seems to address this problem correctly at least 
> for the single-link model:

Maybe the message hasn't been reached the OS stack vendors... but as
of last week, we didn't find any OS that does this correctly.

Linux, for example, will just pick one default gateway, usually "the one 
from the RA received last".

Of course we did not test all available IPv6 stacks, so I would be happy
to learn about implementations that get this right.

(And yes, while technically "not an IETF fault", the aspect that this
was only standardized about 20 years after people had their IPv6 stacks 
written *is*)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279