Re: [v6ops] updated draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 19 September 2019 07:01 UTC

To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <867ca1bc-e2a6-8d1b-8cd0-c4a51c8f83ea@gmail.com> <039e65dbdb8b41feb76971ff89e5ab9d@boeing.com> <b8129cd2-b1d4-99c3-c6f1-549ccdafa6c0@gmail.com> <ff00aa92743d446fa6a4857df1d717d4@boeing.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <24a8ec13-b32c-a060-41e3-c4ade3c0f4d5@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 09:01:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ff00aa92743d446fa6a4857df1d717d4@boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SfUu_7NpJRPAhAo29fdwAY2kam4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] updated draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir
Precedence: list


Le 18/09/2019 à 18:10, Templin (US), Fred L a écrit :
> Alex, my documents were presented at v6ops sessions multiple times
> with corresponding discussion on the list, but we were told there was
> not enough interest to adopt them as wg items. If the climate in
> v6ops has somehow changed since then, then I think my docs would be
> the ones used as a starting point but could consider combining in 
> some way?

I have not seen a sign of climate change in v6ops WG with respect to 
this kind of problem: DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation and prefix division for 
mobile router on cellular links.

If there is change, I think indeed a generic approach considering 
domains like civil aviation as well as IoT class devices, tethered 
smartphones and mobile routers, is appropriate.  They are all mobile 
computers that need to connect to an IPv6 fixed network, in a scalable 
manner.

> Here is another active document with an approach to Prefix
> Registration (as opposed to
> 
> Prefix Delegation) that is being considered for civil aviation:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-atn-aero-interface/

It's an interesting draft.  Maybe we can advantageously refer bilaterally.

Alex

> 
> Thanks - Fred
> 
> *From:*Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com] 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:22 AM *To:* Templin (US),
> Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>; v6ops@ietf.org *Subject:* Re:
> [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?
> 
> Thank you for the pointers, we will add reference to them.  These
> drafts are indeed in the same space.
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 17/09/2019 à 16:00, Templin (US), Fred L a écrit :
> 
> I think it is very similar to drafts I have presented in v6ops in the
> past:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost/
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-dhcpv6-ndopt/
> 
> We also have implementation experience with these drafts.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> 
> *From:*v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Alexandre
> Petrescu *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:18 AM *To:*
> v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> *Subject:* [v6ops] update
> draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?
> 
> Hi v6ops,
> 
> Our draft draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03.txt is about to expire.
> 
> We think about updating it with an implementation section.
> 
> What do you think about this draft?
> 
> Alex and Dmytro
>

[v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03? Alexandre Petrescu
Re: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03? Templin (US), Fred L
Re: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03? Alexandre Petrescu
Re: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03? Templin (US), Fred L
Re: [v6ops] updated draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir Alexandre Petrescu
Re: [v6ops] updated draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir Templin (US), Fred L