IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 04:10 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA831A6F68 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DH9U-oV1eDJb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:10:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738DC1A873C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:10:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1764; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446696631; x=1447906231; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xi1JznTQHTrqz4116Miveq+g+M6aTyyMsnGW/hu/Y6A=; b=S8oAHgdh4s/z/VLV07ye9nXmmlM3ImTifofGRmb65PQ+tHRZujv8R5cX fEcjiC9wkRJitW8Fi5hgz8cGWyKlmRCL5Svh8xRcreYlXVtO6EAG0kv00 z+OJ2SgYhUJ68Q4HXUabykVW6vF4WpF0gn4hegqGRD8rDlfW29U6D8eoI 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C5AgCs1TpW/4ENJK1egzuBQga9eQ6BXoYSAoFBOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENQEBAQMBeQULAgEIGC4yJQIEDgUOiBgIwX8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPCYhkgm6IJIEUAQSWSAGCUYFhiHCBWpZ1g3EBHwFDhARyhBiBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,246,1444694400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="41966873"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2015 04:10:30 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA54AUtr005780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 04:10:30 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:10:29 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 23:10:29 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRF3/owQdu0txsyUenmT0+e1z/lg==
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:10:29 +0000
Message-ID: <ACFC254D-9502-44B8-BAE7-7CD71DC19CA1@cisco.com>
References: <20151001150947.6527.30286.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr3Xw=ddZieF0OzU=wyqs2P5WXvRh8CXn1S2qS6WEZmb9A@mail.gmail.com> <E616A912-FC4D-4EBE-ABFA-17CD60CC5D79@cisco.com> <563AB457.20302@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: <563AB457.20302@sonic.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.70.233.10]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B3248A5F-AB14-4F73-B1ED-86BA031F97E9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SgO2Tf5yY6fJScWIbLdt8Vx-VYk>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:10:38 -0000

> On Nov 5, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> wrote:
> 
> Thus I think section 5.2 should be removed and that discussion be had in the 6man WG.

Dumb question - is your reservation a charter question or a technical question? If it's a charter question, one possible resolution would be to request a supporting 6man consensus statement. If it's technical, that is a whole different discussion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email