IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15BA1A8750 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:07:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3p8NVDFUrHg9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:07:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E06AA1A8747 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykek133 with SMTP id k133so38352421yke.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 13:07:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MbAN7ez8FnFs2sbRryQY3Ni3bXbB3HTLKAuEov16iaM=; b=ilDvNf27n8W9ZbmWnZLFte1IloPW1Dbfz1o4TaYmlqZG+gXGhSCwqfNjwmFxlZgwo3 vk/iS07zoyrxIe6J75hbRMM4UzhdKk8bF6MdPXEw3PGoG8JYkHKRN73d5EfDsBqRVSet H409li3Y6uIAMZXZOoyO/VB5IooyQc6VIgCMccUcVgnwid+ai3HmCz5/HS7OvcDTdqpI HcNtGgwOKk/PBDbJwRDqTqLcqXBR0zMqYtIOQxElYeHoa2r/yNEHmiGJjkyRIiT58V9H 9PL7PrZdoXdAvnwtoYRkDF80TGhnU9Uhbq10RD+v6bKAf84Ag2u2Xh0YIq3hRIhHNml4 TT3A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.56.72 with SMTP id f69mr18596230vka.27.1446584850924; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 13:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.67.194 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.67.194 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:07:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151103204237.GJ70452@Space.Net>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <563733AF.4010509@gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C231921A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5637D854.2090203@bogus.com> <5637E84B.5090001@gmail.com> <5637EB69.1080608@umn.edu> <03358859-8078-489E-835D-3B4D324381BE@delong.com> <20151103204237.GJ70452@Space.Net>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 08:07:30 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xen4gCfkJphZYKfjff5ZsEn_jOf5V16OtYOYNw2VKVAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11434a3a2d49ff0523a948d5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SqlA2XR8kJP6BjiQMNisB6r9sf8>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:07:34 -0000

On 4 Nov 2015 7:42 AM, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:33:43AM -0500, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > I strongly support making ULA go away.
>
> There is no consensus for that.  As prior speakers said, ULAs are useful.
>

It'll also discourage IPv6 adoption if they go away.

If people have to pay for IPv6 address space just to use IPv6 they'll
either steal public IPv6 space to use instead, or stick with IPv4 and
RFC1918s.

> Gert Doering
>         -- Operator
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email