IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 04 January 2018 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5802212025C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 01:01:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zQFjvy7Fc-c for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 01:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C65120227 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 01:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id p139so1571847itb.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:01:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RnB3T/2TncQflS4l9JhxDFQl8WB6QSy4bC6nTtdsfoI=; b=QL9qwN3Jtxskg2DVUsT4GmgohYPyUM7JWUdiegFIQmXLCMdGDpLR27H3b3zU4cDpaU SIjuH8cqLDPiTJ6aXPf1OvnEyQwVNiSwYcABJAZv2gDOTZvPYq+l55+Lf1IDdCmUmiFr Fi8BQ+0l7yxq+DI2FdQyvvGvmoTa8nuDeV/sNwMZp1Q6kLTGOUHGoA6NXICYR4SyCsfS iS9K5DLtA1QDawb6uX+H1Rfl2YJ1jYMnXyK5umBsHiT7TR7DN/FWXkNtjHz/opoUQuzx 9ASWJkQx1S0UdaDOl4FxAVZRTz5PoFaA+JvACkVQJnJ88XqZPYTh5jO4R0o61uOcqxNL D53Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RnB3T/2TncQflS4l9JhxDFQl8WB6QSy4bC6nTtdsfoI=; b=f0hNYPc5rYIQHNAgK2guVzFVAUV4OVfzejXjcDj9hEo/gZJziW4cnXbswaNR1TJ1WJ rWSb3LF4GOSnss37dpKfyKnZMORP5cJsNs8u/PxetQAaLWQGqUyzZjJvKsO7lcxjk8l7 +h4Jc39JG4z+R2MUHhEyLNOFibvFy2RfqsKuhXRBUz2A8d81dDiZP6PeZstj/QRCDCwH XrgfExBW3Jety6G5J9zqntZsu8uebo1ottKP+mRGu1KIeMEvErUBENvoxNumdz8lZeVM f0/vYXLzGzXbRzCD5tO9TsKcB/bK56BJxxXADfplgB2VEy8HuTeha1pOXzZjTZeiNIn1 Wn/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJlncjwBFVrIR40Ga+QZYUeOHf05iL9V5tintL0IZSnmNLGUEwA AB+HOzasGf+kKKcqH7glXf+RK5tuB16bjEt9VoDdZQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoux/8Mk95lWGLj1n16dBvfCMXhSocvvCNbotoD5btAb2jmqQtdCjg0SWSBsWC2B9sDv66UwQHeVK7UeocDzN7I=
X-Received: by 10.36.81.149 with SMTP id s143mr5112332ita.144.1515056501263; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:01:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.176.204 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 01:01:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B7CB2B98-F069-425D-A096-AADA0297B34C@gmail.com>
References: <B7CB2B98-F069-425D-A096-AADA0297B34C@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 18:01:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0r=OZKWHatcaV5ZfXUcJhTrzGqnd6wno7SLur9cJzF5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/SvMsSjizMnd0rZ9UiPXQ2xBT-Ho>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 09:01:45 -0000

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> The authors of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs have just updated it. I wonder what we, as a working group, think of it?

As the implementer of devices that are sometimes IPv6 routers, I
object to the requirement that such devices MUST implement DHCPv6. The
reason is that implementing DHCPv6 will degrade the user experience.
See https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg26286.html
for an example of how that can happen.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email