IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 04:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657FB1A0242 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 21:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6OmP7VM2JIc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 21:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3011A0263 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 21:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u10so1503146lbd.18 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=F6gn6c+Q9ZXo6Ht7kn39oo7nO+wXasT/3N7YJywqj90=; b=C0192sDWXW1Xg69yPSZh3z4Vr1guUMSPHDFJRO1vpum3EU8YSROl93milQzVIwHTg+ 9G2zCxr6WtjfRQMzoHX9LBvbqLuVxer8MA6dWwlaSWQemIGA4faPqxNK7eCvXnLLHuLe zjwEtQM5hGWitRz5yUH3F6BLIfAoCx7egyAxIRws2FXceebQgBdqJ/24lij+nAFQKQts I5PNog4MyTzXYAMPn53w2VD2Ybzjy2pnJZMWbbSShdfTGTIj6NfUl/PSgoKYFoxXhhsl OxfV4YdY6ATuFx52XgPMjghM6EYGG+evgUv/0QvzfXJ5Ejl72nO9ADvavDd49ABrephM CzFQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.148.10 with SMTP id to10mr55501lbb.77.1407473139254; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:c455:102:aa6c:4e7e? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:c455:102:aa6c:4e7e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yg3sm2808433lbb.13.2014.08.07.21.45.37 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM+vMEQ4oc6xBL-N75CLNdC1JSgfDRAD9frtXFqMkk+_E5bLrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 07:45:35 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77260D8E-AB97-4845-90C6-2551F044CF81@gmail.com>
References: <256EAE0B-5C11-42C7-BCA1-CEC7EE6713A7@cisco.com> <53DFD634.4020304@fud.no> <DE860EBC-171E-46E7-A3B6-5E8B79A453CC@cisco.com> <53DFEC6C.3010707@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRUWxT5XiNxMi_S5VgYtGMLb_FVHXN-ZfGpcY=geix15g@mail.gmail.com> <53E06AC9.9010908@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTwt-20gXs=RUH5zbhT+g3HKrvXHX3FnShjF1srqU21Fw@mail.gmail.com> <94146541-768B-4853-A011-7558655C361C@eircom.net> <53E11795.7060305@fud.no> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1408060856080.7929@uplift.swm.pp.se> <53E1D951.8030200@fud.no> <3f59106bc21840dfb144c7933215294f@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <53E27522.4070901@fud.no> <84A403BD-7E93-4D99-8C11-FB7F91B68154@eircom.net> <0CEE83E4-FA58-4D85-B753-1F218540C624@eircom.net> <53E30E74.7050502@fud.no> <CAD6AjGTjYTzDRC_UbmmwiafAYch-VH=_sOaMWu+tMOQNrcEOCQ@mail.gmail.com> <f6347a8cb7cf49f19bc994efc6b66a25@BLUPR04MB596.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <B650CA16-AB89-41B1-8DEC-BBB782B21E64@eircom.net> <CAM+vMEQ4oc6xBL-N75CLNdC1JSgfDRAD9frtXFqMkk+_E5bLrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Swsy95ostg0Yp7MvhEltIzXeHkU
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 04:45:45 -0000

On Aug 8, 2014, at 3:51 AM, GangChen wrote:

> 2014-08-07 21:35 GMT+08:00, Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>:
>> 
>> On 7 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> When I’m abroad, I always make a point to test all operators on IPv6-only
>>> and always see a lot of failure. This becomes especially apparent if the
>>> home operator performs some steering of roaming targeted to an operator
>>> that doesn’t allow IPv6.
>>> Dave Michaud
>> 
>> Steering of roaming sounds like a failure mode that should be mentioned in
>> the draft.
> 
> 
> Are you using VPLMN-Dynamic-Address-Allowed flag to steer roaming?

Without knowing the details in this case but steering of roaming
usually means affecting the PLMN selection the UE does.. e.g. by
purposely failing signaling on the network side until a desired
PLMN gets selected or some other means.

- Jouni



> 
> 
> 
>> BR
>> Ross
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email