IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?

"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2151F120AD6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5gxRcRebwUVy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE9F120AAF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id x8IGAqF4018325; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:10:53 -0400
Received: from XCH16-07-07.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-07.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.109]) by clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id x8IGAmCt017287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:10:48 -0400
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-07.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:10:47 -0700
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5%2]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:10:47 -0700
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?
Thread-Index: AQHVbTB7/bJGAhEihk6EOgf0EyR1Pacv5GsQgAGaNID///u0EA==
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:10:47 +0000
Message-ID: <ff00aa92743d446fa6a4857df1d717d4@boeing.com>
References: <867ca1bc-e2a6-8d1b-8cd0-c4a51c8f83ea@gmail.com> <039e65dbdb8b41feb76971ff89e5ab9d@boeing.com> <b8129cd2-b1d4-99c3-c6f1-549ccdafa6c0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b8129cd2-b1d4-99c3-c6f1-549ccdafa6c0@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: 4F3CA9B26059BC14DEC717DC3E06918E96D74D7C64B757B47A9F3ED591F77B9A2000:8
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ff00aa92743d446fa6a4857df1d717d4boeingcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/T15IXf0CQeXwzb5NZ-XaWhthMUs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:11:00 -0000

Alex, my documents were presented at v6ops sessions multiple times with corresponding
discussion on the list, but we were told there was not enough interest to adopt them as wg
items. If the climate in v6ops has somehow changed since then, then I think my docs would
be the ones used as a starting point but could consider combining in some way?

Here is another active document with an approach to Prefix Registration (as opposed to
Prefix Delegation) that is being considered for civil aviation:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-atn-aero-interface/

Thanks - Fred

From: Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:22 AM
To: Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>; v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?


Thank you for the pointers, we will add reference to them.  These drafts are indeed in the same space.

Alex
Le 17/09/2019 à 16:00, Templin (US), Fred L a écrit :
I think it is very similar to drafts I have presented in v6ops in the past:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-dhcpv6-ndopt/

We also have implementation experience with these drafts.

Thanks - Fred

From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:18 AM
To: v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: [v6ops] update draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03?


Hi v6ops,

Our draft draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03.txt is about to expire.

We think about updating it with an implementation section.

What do you think about this draft?

Alex and Dmytro

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email