Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 27 December 2010 23:03 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4FB3A68ED for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:03:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kYcEHsLBxEmx for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:03:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6353A67EF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:03:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joelja-mac.local (c-76-115-175-145.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [76.115.175.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBRN54BD097790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:05:05 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4D191B9B.7010905@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:04:59 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Toru Kuboshiki <toru.kuboshiki@wata-lab.meijo-u.ac.jp>
References: <AANLkTik248vSqAb79=oEWmzNwZ4xOP7ZSp01b6A4bXZ4@mail.gmail.com> <016401cb9d09$f5669b80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20101218092942.728ac161@opy.nosense.org> <AANLkTimre0KetNCA1Ai_Vv=85o35O_E3UK=hpLC8Onjv@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinGvtHU7FYX9V5kfXO69eO2YUP5o-KpR1C33YQ7@mail.gmail.com> <50C073CF-5AF2-401E-B753-5E20550F9AD2@cisco.com> <AANLkTinS2r+gss88+nievMx5og4HNozz2PWHyrf+5sZw@mail.gmail.com> <4D11B631.40406@bogus.com> <1B3E2DA6-EF0B-42A1-873D-15FCD1060023@merike.com> <4D128024.6010608@gont.com.ar> <A4C28CA7-AEFC-432B-BD82-B8228F02E81E@cisco.com> <4D12B9A6.5050307@gont.com.ar> <AANLkTikPMZM=fe9Uv1=iFcJOx9=0_m-uw0h97Ld17yp-@mail.gmail.com> <4D12C529.8040404@gont.com.ar> <4269EA985EACD24987D82DAE2FEC62E502CDB101@XMB-AMS-101.cisco.com> <AANLkTim+2Ug8ne-XcBzVNDJqF2zOzej4FF9ikJZyAXE1@mail.gmail.com> <4269EA985EACD24987D82DAE2FEC62E502D58041@XMB-AMS-101.cisco.com> <4D16E08D.5060506@gont.com.ar> <AANLkTinECWRXbd9DAshVUXvDRkoKWrMYp-qnxZhBD_j4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinECWRXbd9DAshVUXvDRkoKWrMYp-qnxZhBD_j4@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 23:03:02 -0000
On 12/27/10 2:54 PM, Toru Kuboshiki wrote: > Thanks for many opinions. > > I could hear different opinions about network topology hiding and NAT security. > > I intend to study hard and figure out an appropriate result. Please let let us know when you find one (and I don't mean that in jest). Thanks joel > Regards. > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >
- [v6ops] network topology hiding Toru Kuboshiki
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Arturo Servin
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Roland Bless
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Roland Bless
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Michael Newbery
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Merike Kaeo
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Toru Kuboshiki
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Merike Kaeo
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Toru Kuboshiki
- Re: [v6ops] network topology hiding Joel Jaeggli