IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 19 December 2013 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DA61AD948 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:47:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxBx7JBzFx07 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6A71A1F62 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hk11so11944046igb.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:47:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=00ZIidV+9kVtwXF87poSS/dYRZaOuMDw7emSkAetyR4=; b=msZbE/A8RU3dwBeQlZRPgYCJhk8+jKRh//fGDO9fsdIOmRRAlCr9YQa/f4GIX1ewOi FgR/KRpPqY9PgUIap4QBiFKCKJe1sFhbs0zcP74t+PHFJUr2lPO4iNt4+NyaPdNxMb/r 23v+0rIg0IdccZmQm5bfdjkyzun1ERO6NHzSepMr9d5H78QYNyxVvK2oXtlR151q6jVs ZdW9NrNqfIquUQeglBsOThVZNMeh2EIKc+rgD+4LC5IPld+8Bpt6KITjMoANcbl0TCb2 aNAtPEvUQcKAwv8bs58cAWkGcNLyvc4RZjDzPjHkN+vCz1wuKbiHOGvwQ3ZStW3zft3a tzJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=00ZIidV+9kVtwXF87poSS/dYRZaOuMDw7emSkAetyR4=; b=S/KH1oKciGHR8LHh7M1jHb5jtI97RnxzHz0FgI1kEN9TrLWMLOwZ31Zcss6eMs9+eP 6zrjBncHwiWu+58KK8q+yuHELP+aDycb9kyjeMHimWTYauhMHeHGsAOTlH3QHWERiu4U D++rUWlUWANAvHDDBRc1PGA6f48BNYCc7qR4raZKht+b7jjYAmYv5q0q+xEdY2H15iBT 7bNDVVPIM92hYqhGwJapnz1frUoB5ZI6wzOOg6UuduSO5MrRRvcXZGBuOPqkapg/uaTI njCGXq+oHLot/S/0b3KPz36jIkJm2RIxCU0FnmfXQuG5DiPx1oGRO7fB5KnXPhgHWiF9 2mtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRnibLMmljqjbUBw0b0joDCrd4AYTaLDtJOzAs9Bk0XcsmI5sWSZpiSxhidebFYlY/r1Z8alUdrsYiiXQjxNRZ3DesCElGNcBwP8KkRckjvjCg+0rpncGiPi6U163qgux8m0MSARKuzXWbMWF77duja7ehIrEArgreqiuYJp8gUbVBXbtRTZyhaQfla/MewRVBeCC0
X-Received: by 10.50.176.137 with SMTP id ci9mr2725751igc.31.1387460855192; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:47:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:47:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <273B4FE5-E311-4327-8B04-13467AF9D72F@nominum.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1311271353550.3903@ayourtch-mac> <1386274786.29351.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312060759220.68814@ayourtch-mac> <1386378082.99914.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312072028290.68814@ayourtch-mac> <F024FF5B-35A6-4221-952C-4A730A68C59D@delong.com> <D437C864-F276-46A6-A51E-4C57E5CF829E@cisco.com> <52B22828.6080700@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr3TA9+yDpCRHNMOXNiq0bZ0x-yn=kVotiFD2187GjdnWw@mail.gmail.com> <52B2ED1E.1040108@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr2hQBB_gsv6=zRLq6SmxF6JG=o2DT=-iDykSz7u=yJVZg@mail.gmail.com> <273B4FE5-E311-4327-8B04-13467AF9D72F@nominum.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:47:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3aeHu=4wy8NcRvT_bX9OdCE5PZ-JqJGZrxgVsi+uOK4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111e0da69f20804ede3673d"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:47:38 -0000

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> > What you propose requires a DHCPv6 server that's always up and
> perpetually maintains state, and it requires that you run VRRP between the
> routers because DHCPv6.
>
> Hm, would VRRP help us with the homenet problem?
>
> ;)
>

Sure! That's the DHCP way. Make the configuration procotol completely
static, then realize that failures cause outages, and then be build
redundancy into your services because you've chosen a client communication
protocol that doesn't allow updates. Awesome :-)

I always think that the biggest lie in DHCP is that D at the beginning.
It's not dynamic. It should have been called SHCP. :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email