IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 27 January 2012 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D5021F8570; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:42:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crlSkRyoeiq8; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2FC21F8573; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1RquUW-000E2R-MW; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:41:57 +0000
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 07:41:54 +0900
Message-ID: <m2bopo939p.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025315@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <169401ccdd2e$23b48910$6b1d9b30$@com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611025315@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "'v6ops@ietf.org'" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "'pcp@ietf.org'" <pcp@ietf.org>, "'draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org'" <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:42:03 -0000

> I believe the marketplace should determine the winning technology in
> this case, if there is to be a winning technology. RFC6204bis needs to
> continue to take no position.

perhaps the users would like interoperability between their toys and
their border?

as far as the market deciding, i suspect less than .001 of the users
even know there is a protocol used to make this work, let alone care.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email