IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48169127342 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:27:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlXfNDfdXaUT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:27:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B31F126DEE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:27:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w09CRUST047682; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:27:30 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D154205134; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:27:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861A12030B8; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:27:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w09CRUkG004620; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:27:30 +0100
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <B7CB2B98-F069-425D-A096-AADA0297B34C@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0r=OZKWHatcaV5ZfXUcJhTrzGqnd6wno7SLur9cJzF5w@mail.gmail.com> <066901d385ab$64d663b0$2e832b10$@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2GjXKM53rJJwRzX7RyrCG8u+KZ0TTGuFv=NefHsKRxrw@mail.gmail.com> <11d764f6-e0d7-c24e-7b51-c8b5bb026082@gmail.com> <20180109120700.GW45648@Space.Net> <592ac6fa-9d1f-e802-3c29-8d70dedf60b3@gmail.com> <20180109121654.GY45648@Space.Net>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7d0aa9fb-ac74-52dc-0437-01c173f2b38e@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 13:27:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180109121654.GY45648@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/T_LTh7pmJ6O2QJZp0l4tBz-76EU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:27:34 -0000


Le 09/01/2018 à 13:16, Gert Doering a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:15:09PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> Le 09/01/2018 à 13:07, Gert Doering a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:59:06PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>>> On my side I think this: mobile hotspots MUST implement and turn on
>>>> DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation, because it is the only way to be a mobile hotspot.
>>>
>>> Uh... "no"?
>>
>> the most scalable, most secure, most path-efficient,
>> most DNS friendly... most recommendable
> 
> This might all well be, but it is not "the only way to be a mobile hotspot".
> 
> Which falsifies your whole sentence, thus short answer.

Ok, let me rewrite: The Prefix Delegation DHCPv6 is the best way to make 
a mobile hotspot.

Alex

> 
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email