Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Tue, 15 April 2014 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063C91A02CB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEaC_CMFVupW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520131A043C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1838:1003::1826:c02d:dc29:1365] (unknown.ipv6.scnet.net [IPv6:2001:1838:1003:0:1826:c02d:dc29:1365] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s3FFZGo8000778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:35:17 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com s3FFZGo8000778
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1397576118; bh=26VK2HtaI5xSMUzN0CB74nG22u0=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=eVBJtK/JAiab9UqgocSz/Kc7+69H7Z8ta/sTRMMj3PK0XkTn9FcHmug+9EcANtCHl HwgvIxbUw48SBlBA/v+/AZJXfr86qoCBH3vxQTXyHej+58xZl9YsD7SENuKIlJtDgJ Z59JnqqEfWXHsudro/RFbb48rV1oT1WVZ9sq2RFk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <534D4D32.7080001@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:35:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <438CE365-71E8-4ED0-BDD6-2367C0CD2CEB@delong.com>
References: <534BF5A5.5010609@viagenie.ca> <20140415142103.GA50776@ricotta.doit.wisc.edu> <534D4D32.7080001@viagenie.ca>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/TjMbFJUbS7icqL3jcf187TC-LIk
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:38:38 -0000

> 
>> 3.3:  Mobile device vendors have an incentive in fixing their code so
>> they do not chew up their battery more than their competitors.
> 
> Yet the problem has not been fixed.

… YET


Reality, however, is that encouraging them to fix that could be accomplished just as easily as getting them to implement this new IPv6-based modification to their DHCPv4 client behavior. In fact, it could even be done without necessarily waiting for them to implement IPv6 in said client.

Owen