Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF8D1F0C36 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:53:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.179, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycqDKJK9VFII for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCEB1F0C3C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so3680103dak.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:53:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z6EaL3/A00fSxoMqbU0fLrOHygWCgvMvGBug531vmUE=; b=Y6xvhlQqC42CUqRixPNcRm79gN8j/HE1aUpJUjmQnLQQg8l87p5nZNq/EqqtLhgLHQ wIRc93Ky1CBLS286YlYvePNSZ5O5+zDvNdvVMbGSEzQGscb1CNlh2iDmjFbqYVQyIcid tCzwPUKzwgHPCPuMPNS+kQAbia7JJEr7FMxwo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.222.103 with SMTP id ql7mr21274262pbc.53.1328305983449; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.143.78.7 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:53:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcfYJVMVoUg0LGQCzagzQB9L86_JCoa2CE-oYi5=APYSJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcfYJVMVoUg0LGQCzagzQB9L86_JCoa2CE-oYi5=APYSJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:53:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQySpBDLoZedp4mnXfcYQ-iDtwHnO4vN+3atdEhTOrcuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2ed4314be89c04b8165637"
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:53:04 -0000

On Feb 3, 2012 12:58 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya"
<sarikaya2012@<sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
gmail.com <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Cameron,
>
> As you know, many UEs can not connect to an UMTS network on IPv6 due
> to the firmware problem.
>

Absolutely

> How did this affect your experiments?
>

The goal was to test the ability of 464XLAT architecture to enable 100%
functionality of Android applications on an IPv6-only network

That goal was achieved on the Nexus S hardware, which is 1 of the 4 phones
that are capable of doing IPv6 on the T-Mobile USA UMTS network.  We
believe the pipeline of IPv6 phones is improving, we continue to push the
OEMs to support IPv6.

We are happy that the Nexus S has been enabled with IPv6 since the Nexus
line of phones are the official baseline developer phones for Android, and
so we are hopeful that the code can be pushed upstream without much
modification.


CB