Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Mon, 15 June 2015 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C821C1B2DE1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 07:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xsLaBCghcisW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 07:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FE31B2DE7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 07:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1315; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1434378178; x=1435587778; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=2CdFUseS1/wm4fYdUFbW0d0El0yLE3N31b8JWO2xRm4=; b=DhZx0EJqEwDfomK3JcN8JFGgll6SU1jbUSUHpOm4m9Ax3yHWUcY/lF4a +zUOTLuDa3UjHee1soGcmfG9GaYwRvVVSWuvf4pCJMMcK0DXyESoH7h2U oA9mPR3t/G2hIJ23uns+xDNtCfaYDwy36oag/LuxNGCpwR0mK5kn90jKi w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BpBADs3n5V/40NJK1cgxCBMwa9XgmHWQKBNTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEDATo/BQcEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcyFAkIAgQOBQiIHwjKXgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLRIRVMQcGgxGBFgEEk1sBo1EmY4MWb4FGgQEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,618,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="159601982"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Jun 2015 14:22:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5FEMuUd008425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:22:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.34]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:22:56 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHQpsv6CmFF/Tc6RUKsJ+zURc6D2Z2tbV8ggABfiQD//9LEsA==
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:22:55 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89168A5C9B@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <201506141800.t5EI02ol016995@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89168A5B92@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <20150615140350.17d819fe@envy.fud.no>
In-Reply-To: <20150615140350.17d819fe@envy.fud.no>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.131.71.109]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/TuNcNI8MGJ5a_M6bBR5TrgldlfA>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:24:25 -0000

Tore,

Thanks for the explanation - got it.  Sounds good to remove the statements.  Other than that, the document looks good to me. 

Thanks,

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: Tore Anderson [mailto:tore@fud.no] 
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:04 AM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: Fred Baker (fred); v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC

Hi Hemant,

* Hemant Singh (shemant)

> At the end of the A.1 section you have text that says "Note that this 
> is the exact opposite of the SIIT-DC use case".  At the end of the
> A.3 section you have text that says  "Note that this is the exact 
> opposite of the 464XLAT use case".
> 
> It's not clear to me what is "opposite" referring to.

The use cases are opposite to each other, e.g.:

- A.1 (464XLAT) is opposite to A.3 (SIIT-DC)
- A.3 (SIIT-DC) is opposite to A.1 (464XLAT)

...in the sense that an IPv4 packet traversing a 464XLAT CLAT and being tranlated to IPv6 is sent by a local IPv4 app and is destined for the public Internet, while an IPv4 packet traversing an SIIT-DC gateway is sent from the public Internet and is destined for a local
IPv4 service.

> Do you even need these two sentences in the document?

No, probably not. We'll remove them, thanks!

Tore