IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-04.txt

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E971A8769 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:41:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrkLlmBklCCW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF3B1A8794 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so72356556pas.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:41:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nestlabs.com; s=google; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to; bh=Dpx4VxkpjLlxY2dms4oqkhHWf61e4GlvK1ptvT6l2WI=; b=CQ+ToHPKzLurA9N4DN4e8CSbHZNDkjECC8R9uN8k6QOn+E0EVgmKjU7Ei4hIBKor2D EWMhelKyVLGV7JZJtUV0Q+axBdBDulKKpC9sbc1K6C7X23D4mmJr7Oadp98mrDrtoDBf KhzXvG0VTspDsOChNeYBa+5P0fGZlBKV6wnhg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=Dpx4VxkpjLlxY2dms4oqkhHWf61e4GlvK1ptvT6l2WI=; b=CmK5XTtVhWLpFlBcEC4ryK0z79fHQs9TlAmSTVszUSB8eeb5UJROvKYxv6pk1dg9sA qo/Wl27Icc5Uj6CMkJ0bpILT28ApOxiqDrv4N2hnFr0c2EY2Q1m/faIXNfG4xvsirAGw 5IKinZcN6ZtnFUmb8lAd3jKcOxtegjB9pc786mntvjpoYvR/Biv0v6HxdrKZoaGYWlG1 NMidlAqLQKfPtPMYVlsKWnS6o/5qZglnOVvhDGTSWNuDdgamV6DAHiN4DZ+BtMXUUE1T m/OZdD8x5A3sHqlhfK/jRKnDiXp7wgqPl6s7TENERXI38lHrubrFucNOPH0AjI9MxN+4 JrBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndFNxKGSVzZS5AiMbyOkpTfFTqYkHOLWMNpJQviX0V2HB4CyfOP792K9j3xGrml0H1H9+AtPdCYx21BdUfGcL7zDzlyVjOvwGbZg8f9RojfuSERsEKgz8rn2trzLaHPmOm9uKCdaibngDdsT2BPFlMkgkfg/C57GmD1gQh+07YuUJZID4=
X-Received: by 10.68.135.132 with SMTP id ps4mr5911497pbb.111.1446687671024; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from t20010c4000003024ed296f969d755b01.v6.meeting.ietf94.jp (t20010c4000003024ed296f969d755b01.v6.meeting.ietf94.jp. [2001:c40:0:3024:ed29:6f96:9d75:5b01]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ou3sm4403648pbb.44.2015.11.04.17.41.09 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:41:10 -0800 (PST)
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B50217F9-CD50-44B8-9304-63F1A0354478"
Message-Id: <8AACD6C0-7B3D-44B0-AEF4-1880A5A63FBD@nestlabs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:41:07 +0900
References: <20141027073843.13643.64057.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8D8A25B4-2E47-4524-9F76-11A0C28DDD39@nestlabs.com>
To: V6OPS Working Group <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8D8A25B4-2E47-4524-9F76-11A0C28DDD39@nestlabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Tx1Nc0TyaErtWovI3Mcoll3WTww>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-04.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:41:14 -0000

Everyone—

This draft A) uses normative requirements language with RFC 2119 keywords and B) calls for publication in the Informational category. Is the document really intended for the Best Current Practice (BCP) category? If not, could we please either remove the citation of RFC 2119 and all the usage of upper case keywords, or insert an explanation for why the document uses normative requirements language despite being an Informational category document?


—james

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email