IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 21 July 2015 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B581B301F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJZzyj-1L2iK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 550451B301E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E94600DF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:23:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3386D602FE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:23:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 95454 invoked by uid 1007); 21 Jul 2015 22:23:06 +0200
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:23:06 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150721202306.GI90924@Space.Net>
References: <6153A91F-7E9A-4579-BA06-72964568D343@cisco.com> <55AE54D3.7070502@gmail.com> <55AE5D01.5090309@gmail.com> <55AE71F7.8000107@gmail.com> <20150721162835.26A9F338B4ED@rock.dv.isc.org> <55AE742E.9040301@gmail.com> <20150721184344.GH90924@Space.Net> <55AEA803.8070504@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1GFpsN+DA+8qGtn4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55AEA803.8070504@gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/U-1mtadqxsB0tQ-dCvJ3XmrXlUQ>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:23:10 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:13:55PM +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Yet ULA gives a certain freedom in the hextets after fd00::, and I would 
> not waste it by generating a fd00:ca10:8fa3 which has no logic.
> 
> fd00:cafe:: is a random prefix, easier to pronounce, to remember and to 
> tell on the phone.

I encourage all my competitors to use "easy to pronounce and remember"
ULA prefixes.  Their address collisions are my saved OPEX.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email