IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-01

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5674311E813B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:34:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XyAST7e-1LUh for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A317311E8159 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:33:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AZX59050; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:33:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:33:17 +0000
Received: from NKGEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.35) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:33:53 +0000
Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.252]) by nkgeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 03:33:45 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-01
Thread-Index: AQHO2dEFjLLTF7PKn0+84GG5Ze7x7ZoXB2YD
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:33:44 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D7F0935@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <D4AF0B1E-80A7-4F16-ACAD-6A6094E1EF1A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <EMEW3|341beb4bac4ceabdf493a8a0d53c2528pA42iP03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D4AF0B1E-80A7-4F16-ACAD-6A6094E1EF1A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|341beb4bac4ceabdf493a8a0d53c2528pA42iP03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D4AF0B1E-80A7-4F16-ACAD-6A6094E1EF1A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.132.36]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D7F0935nkgeml506mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:34:01 -0000

Hi Tim,



Thanks for you comment. Please see inline.

________________________________
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Tim Chown [tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 18:43
To: IPv6 Operations
Subject: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-01

Hi Bing,

In section 1 you say:

“ The use of ULA addresses in various types of networks has been

 confusing to network operators. Some network operators believe ULAs
 are not useful at all while other network operators have run ULAs
 beneficially in their networks."

This implies you know operators who are using ULAs beneficially. It would be nice if those operators are reading this and can comment.  Or failing that for you to make it clear where possible in the text which parts you are writing based on those operators’ comments, and which parts are more theoretical.

[Bing] The reason why we wrote this was because our co-author who is from an ISP was actually using ULA in their networks.
But I agree with you the wording need to be tidted.

There are some parts of the text which are written almost in note form.  It would be nice to tidt those parts up a little.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email