IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Mon, 15 June 2015 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6FB1B2B96 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 04:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFfFqCzjzUEG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0C901AD186 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 04:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1382; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1434367610; x=1435577210; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=GCBYm1L1IWmr8+2WIjSDIipGvWzzS0Rk2Jid4hKc26E=; b=H0ypHYoMQeZb4yPb0qkSifTp0hzTIU7duM1j1AsvsOgml7ypQIUXNc6N hbcYrpQX4QHQ56h8ywQ1jSs19RbkATUErXnb6u8QrTit/2TZdUjmJek4B MBdDTY505V6WDqOTCZiu7tPhWjces8FrXHAIi9NiWrQyR4wwtLuctK6Ta Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AnBAAetn5V/4QNJK1cgxBUXwa9WgmBVwqFegKBMjgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEEAQEBNzQXBAIBCBEEAQELFAkHJwsUCQgCBAESCIgnDclwAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSLRIRVOAaDEYEWBZNbAYx0hASDBYt5g1smY4MWb4FGgQEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,618,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="159396448"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2015 11:26:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5FBQmZh001322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:26:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.34]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:26:48 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHQpsv6CmFF/Tc6RUKsJ+zURc6D2Z2tbV8g
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:26:48 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89168A5B92@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <201506141800.t5EI02ol016995@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201506141800.t5EI02ol016995@irp-lnx1.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.251.158]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UDYGFUlelvqfE2N-clAJu0o7cFc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:26:51 -0000

Tore/Alberto,

At the end of the A.1 section you have text that says "Note that this is the exact opposite of the SIIT-DC use case".  At the end of the A.3 section you have text that says  "Note that this is the exact opposite of the 464XLAT use case".

It's not clear to me what is "opposite" referring to.   Do you even need these two sentences in the document?

Thanks,

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:00 PM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam WGLC

This is to initiate a two week working group last call of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam.  
Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.

We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email