Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only mobile ISP alliance

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 12 January 2018 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F6F1267BB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 01:55:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ALddfJZ_S8C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 01:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD39124239 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 01:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w0C9tkAr124406; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:55:46 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E109208112; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:55:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FE62080E6; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:55:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w0C9tjDR017457; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:55:45 +0100
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <542c87df1c214bdd9457fab0f8874fc7@orange.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801111240540.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAD6AjGS8YpvSaTf5QquU3NMVv618CGtded9z1TnpsJ5vA9tsMg@mail.gmail.com> <e24cbe3a-ae60-7e1b-09c7-67b0f76d8803@gmail.com> <20180112104509.3eb1f5f6@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <72640ffd-5fb2-94eb-b0ad-56f791f97aec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:55:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180112104509.3eb1f5f6@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UHrJpmAN0kzOJT_xVnU4mrIcr0o>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only mobile ISP alliance
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:55:54 -0000


Le 12/01/2018 à 10:45, Tore Anderson a écrit :
> * Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
> 
>> There must be something in Norway as well, something like 'Telenor' if I
>> remember correctly, it was the first one to do true IPv6 to smartphone
>> (not 464XLAT).
> 
> «True IPv6» is a prerequisite for 464XLAT, so this statement does not
> really make any sense.

Ah.  I definitely have to work my vocabulary.

> That said, Telenor was not the first. I think that award might go to
> Verizon Wireless in the United States.

In terms of years, IIRC, I received an invitation in year approximate 
2007 to go to Norway and try native IPv6 on mobile phone there (it was 
straight IPv6 on phone, not IPv6-in-IPv4, which was done even earlier, 
like 2001).

> I am not certain, but they
> definitively arrived earlier to the IPv6 party than Telenor did at
> least.

Could be.

> Telenor did initially launch 464XLAT for a small number of UEs, but
> this approach was abandoned in favour of dual stack. Their deployment
> is currently just shy of 75% IPv6 according to my own measurements:
> 
> https://munin.fud.no/vg.no/www.vg.no/vg_ds_telenor_mobil.html

These figures are impressive, showing a majority of traffic is IPv6.  It 
is very encouraging.

> There's also another small Norwegian PLMN called Ice that has rolled
> out IPv6. As far as I've been told they are also using dual stack, not
> 464XLAT.

Ah, good to know, this dual stack.

ALex