IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 09 December 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0D312000F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:50:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Hm4yiLiY; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=QqlwXmN2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIRFZSUJwtRy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2F5120099 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 07:50:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3503; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1575906651; x=1577116251; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=+lZZ9uixgiMTeKLIPlS+kWmPPBe09mFepG5l9sZLbxI=; b=Hm4yiLiYS6HZzhrI3a+f5g0CXKuwOjHnDU9rMeWPUISW1jMvRgiYHHzw ZoNinR3qC9qaUSfpH8drn6gyB8wRKBcKbsEsr6cX05Qjr7CETBZ6qf2qR 1t2kHI0mpjPqKDKDohOC86/mpui8lkC/Zb0CfAinMFKXZu8iNdygnDd8i 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:dCHZ9B8k7fHI7f9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+/YR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfJq3UeaNpJXh4Bh98Rmlk+B8qXIUb6N/XtKSc9GZcKWQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CsBQBrbO5d/4YNJK1kHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgX6BHC9QBYFEIAQLKoQCg0YDiwGWAoRiglIDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgEBhEACF4ICJDgTAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFUwIBAxIRHQEBNwEPAgEIBAoxAwICAjAUEQIEDgUigwCBek0DLgECoUMCgTiIYXWBMoJ+AQEFhRAYghcJgTaMGBqCAIE4IIJMPodZMoIsjSWDAoVQmGYKgi6VZhuaMqh1AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIjeBIXAVZQGCQVARFFeMD4NzilN0gSiNaQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,296,1571702400"; d="scan'208,217";a="389327058"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Dec 2019 15:50:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xB9FooXq015496 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:50:50 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:50:49 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:50:48 -0600
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:50:48 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dInXzczaoIUfrK0KEIOXY6xTjCDnjqc0Ux9VtnNGrcnFedYWDXWeKWqERcZclpSCh5EtJmFjn6RH5wsjzuvOnqGi0r39BIFIp0wDRFMYK413xVYr8ickEmrlDbqyV87GGCPA2Qt47+diXxfkbX0xCb0qfKXdCPoJa+VCv5StV9Qfi8b/FFs5HNhg53UCv+z0iVb492SD3hjRdWA8yLexnEA+MCjNJGQuMGJxO1xQ40dnUd1QwYtxBWdQdNwNGU9uvsSrKkcVcygpBXLSPfKs1OAHZI8Z560ELWffdjGTZNeQQDQIwDG2pAbnuqIDKZ6wuE+T0YLiZ4Ji+PWeOrdBDQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+lZZ9uixgiMTeKLIPlS+kWmPPBe09mFepG5l9sZLbxI=; b=Z1+yZmSx/jwVrCYpSs0yVk6KP45Xp9KmHB4Ul2bAsBykVxTpHImfkrdxP7dedS/GI3Q+PousGXrlXff4maJyzIhVcciLhZ8+J+d2Sed7VwhDDZpIJr/n38GKFuzjKQMw9Po5C2QX+TR1uX2XoFmg4dpKckoVlYdIGVuZD3kt31jIIb9F3gt2FB5CpLWAi11Ar5aESwf+5mCMhRtAtQaTCjqYdSjyTqc5XB7okKq2QaQd47WsG/pNY1qRRHyKCNThIOtmvOmfr4EJkHN3PBVmx11vPyMU4G4Xztx+/kK7MJXEh3zWpruszXUXFrAvnsHBA9V53fVJEOmSBNBSY50NYg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+lZZ9uixgiMTeKLIPlS+kWmPPBe09mFepG5l9sZLbxI=; b=QqlwXmN2RvfkHmoESCI4Rwk800XcYJPZGR7pyjvEJGKCsYxrlQq+BdHxd+G7nAuy+XPj6r1FrOSBhtz2ZuApF9zMCc4FV2X3aPgW42JhEuraGDTpnVJS/wZLswMI1IU0E8GinlzebyfJPSOg9FLnJc8UYA3MeUzHxWzOeNf7NgE=
Received: from DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.176.126.158) by DM6PR11MB4140.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.61.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2516.14; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:50:47 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4194:dade:1d47:2678]) by DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4194:dade:1d47:2678%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2516.018; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:50:47 +0000
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
Thread-Index: AQHVrph2epYC8FtIKky3loNP84z23aex1NRpgAAEqwCAAAQjEIAADT4AgAAAjoCAAADaAIAAA4cAgAAAxACAAAFJAIAAAcuG
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:50:47 +0000
Message-ID: <74934A64-D04E-49C1-94EC-71C0000070E6@cisco.com>
References: <F5AAD5B7-22BD-4474-9A1E-1A97AFFE47FC@cisco.com> <1655AE1A-EF2E-4720-BFBE-FA512CC4D240@cisco.com> <85E7ECA2-3538-48D7-99CB-7E978E7C0F03@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1qSV4mzAqP7hNWKHbppQmJ=r-ajdFRfdscfvukhdUf=A@mail.gmail.com> <BA520BC5-1286-4C66-8B55-AA56322F721B@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1fKSno-m8hRHkOP-_=ZazW7o8354x0L4_S-7MhzASGDA@mail.gmail.com>, <B8319B81-812C-48B4-82C7-31EB5584AC4D@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8319B81-812C-48B4-82C7-31EB5584AC4D@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=volz@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2600:1000:b00f:b0ad:6cd9:43c2:ae16:91b2]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 08deb607-e460-4e6b-1b67-08d77cbf8f0f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB4140:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB4140C683FD4D463511CBF1F4CF580@DM6PR11MB4140.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5236;
x-forefront-prvs: 02462830BE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(346002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(66946007)(5660300002)(54906003)(66446008)(76116006)(91956017)(66476007)(33656002)(64756008)(86362001)(478600001)(66556008)(6486002)(316002)(6916009)(6512007)(53546011)(6506007)(186003)(2616005)(2906002)(8936002)(4744005)(36756003)(229853002)(4326008)(81156014)(8676002)(71200400001)(81166006)(71190400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR11MB4140; H:DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: fQ5ZAlO9M5ild0+jUdZreS//jvZ3vuhwvzxqFMUOrxXqAMrpVN09rHaYYx4vMrSGsdspkfnXoXoDePZzxzZSJZwrsbEtTrSnaP2O0sP18AreMDBlHh1Y0vfayOYPL8x7L+RA+MIvToE98ibo/ucmZftRsu27IFXVNhYhTsoNKsaW/cqDUvET0Ex6dsjtAPxkLwcknd74sMln8JQYsq9EWBubf5u9tfbLtiuXGdvH0eWYcMkCnFZJ57FKV9EoceSXX7OUAtd9xdb3IGwHRUFvgkTO9NoKzDTGJyy/mvBIVxE58RavLDlG/5X14V+sQq/lNTC1nYIFri5ObqTorLpbiqRPrtSrOg2+An76ILVkg2qT9DlCQZh6bhJMzDUYhp4gvN728mSfDMbHp5FYAQpKwi8SyJ9oAxub9vROfuhPb0HjdNJDlSXsYPIZ/vcK0X+N
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_74934A64D04E49C194EC71C0000070E6ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 08deb607-e460-4e6b-1b67-08d77cbf8f0f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Dec 2019 15:50:47.4825 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: +J/KTMocIDsHJbwqe2OaWVhkDbjDTgJRX7RvgyCrajKVPFf0OWhF2hW9rcmRE+AE
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB4140
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.17, xch-aln-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UJqC0eB_90PStcz4OJRcYCDQmMc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 15:50:53 -0000

As clients have to change to support this, fix the PRL option handling.

- Bernie (from iPhone)

On Dec 9, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

 On Dec 9, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>> wrote:
Can we simply say that those clients cannot use this option, then? It seems unfortunate to say that well-behaved clients that do know how to use the PRL should have to add the option to their request packets outside the PRL.

The trouble is, I don’t know how prevalent this problem is.  Maybe it’s okay, though—just looking at my own desktop computer, it definitely does seem to be sending a PRL.   Does Android also?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email