IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 17 April 2014 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBD61A01D3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8V7mJq-XOxF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386431A0194 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96752629CD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:54:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5814F629C2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:54:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 14108 invoked by uid 1007); 17 Apr 2014 18:54:47 +0200
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:54:47 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Message-ID: <20140417165447.GA43641@Space.Net>
References: <m1WaMBx-0000BSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <E772899C-8505-4436-8594-380799F91BA0@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr2KFOi_hW3CCSbcT-uPQSwsUyE06cY3r8=CuunSbnz_xw@mail.gmail.com> <D701ADC0-EA9F-48DD-933F-9E02ACF3EBD4@nominum.com> <534EAB83.1070906@foobar.org> <70739713-281A-41E6-93ED-5EE1BC4B7FAB@nominum.com> <534EC1DB.4010902@foobar.org> <575F73AC-8DA5-4E04-B2CF-4875B729C7D3@nominum.com> <534FC59B.201@foobar.org> <1BE293BD-3191-4622-AACA-E9E3689400EB@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1BE293BD-3191-4622-AACA-E9E3689400EB@nominum.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/USC2f5QSPeYvv0hh54QeDO5bmFA
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:54:54 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:57:34AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:
> However, my point is that v6ops doesn't get any special veto power over this if you don't raise substantive objections.

It will be interesting to see IETF last call on this, if there is 
significant objection being ignored "because it's from the wrong WG".

(Besides this, I've long stopped caring about this thread.  There's way
too much religion in here)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email