[v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environment
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 24 July 2024 02:33 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C50C1524DC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zocFN6ct59Kq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE851C18DB9A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-70446231242so3112405a34.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1721788383; x=1722393183; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Vi3ZAPzEIV7Yo51UlkkcAiMq6Jqfi2chovOETl/jbBk=; b=OicTztIMFahz4YUuCJX+59R3H+dYxTxHrXPCOFnjdbBWM0w/H2bPeEV0SimFFMpx11 iHY5A8/J7ixpx3QvfhF8jTQOOcc5ecj2MFdI4V++lPHYTtj3YPkSxE2mhXBenpbju+mQ 93Zezoi+3VZdPx9WvXEg83r8fue/T6NLYF+SsiF+2MGdZ+2MbJ9lQm1ou8QBDzo+gYuv QtXAs2v1bVwkg/XAi6UUKdj8peq+AtoE+ail/0XrV5RT5uXB6dBfyFFgZOyajBs8zrDL XEaBkqVXDPrnU6FWWfHsp6l/K17+x3bs2ygdZ3vtRFldoRn6qqdLCfjSLJH9ZOq6f5Tq VBvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721788383; x=1722393183; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Vi3ZAPzEIV7Yo51UlkkcAiMq6Jqfi2chovOETl/jbBk=; b=CtXrERnzsMtVv0CtrDK0BIWYI5ihdaqDwihBwG2OhhCmzMBT0EdPEdAWChjKUxUMw5 SlLAZX9v8WcsuK8g1fhiKCKIYtw1GXyYU37sznqOlB30lKyFEsXYtTLdET/h3MMMQLKj qf8wi5Wpr/rv3MzMbty8hZgzR92Qs/f9ouJwfh01jclmZFA/22Impp9PiNCNBlULgKll T2l74+MiTSmO+TtSspuje++L4tB2DKqrYvjuTxh7ODaKOuDjiwex4nVJEYxIuRM7PWKt 0CaaPZHQm7C/0Z3wNzWfNYYGVcjlhBtEEkRD/2W719a5Et0T+DnLkUglIc7n3RVomBzM 4IwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrW62IxUL+NElhp0KdNW0Bc75ntJ0oA4x1KFZr8NaYEfXl0eEF rRC2PoxmMoEzuYbuPNFjeftpltKNsmXNAopx4Enbt6ndOO/HdDdjHagq4+bXww8kxy0g1Hzb8ag Py+idEL97HOUTBgk/H+FN8+j7NNZJGm7UwZbDaysBqfx4sQEN0D76ZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtiDswdWC4BZ0c2buppRQDXaOAw1y4aXaj4WO3j1IzPU9Pnhj9Th7H+tSSMBDdds6ZbVCKLjDXGqrSAxOeAgU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:2194:b0:260:e611:c09 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2648cd4a7e7mr916038fac.47.1721788383611; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN-Dau1tRp02p58O8RKcCAVeXKqnkJt_b14KM5iCcDTm4JmnGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau1tRp02p58O8RKcCAVeXKqnkJt_b14KM5iCcDTm4JmnGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:32:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1ntZmL47HH-zkryVey6NmzEenKfBzZ90hcUQaduZV3sLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fbe87c061df518e6"
Message-ID-Hash: I7NRZGCMIFSQHSLPJEDHQZWORSGDJSCT
X-Message-ID-Hash: I7NRZGCMIFSQHSLPJEDHQZWORSGDJSCT
X-MailFrom: mellon@fugue.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environment
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UaCC1K6CaxTUHeRmsv5BqBHgJtc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>
Can you give us an example of a situation where such a decision would need to be made? On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 6:48 PM David Farmer <farmer= 40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > The classic ISP use case for DHCPv6 PD, as envisioned initially by RFC3633 > and integrated into RFC8415, typically expected a single prefix to be > delegated to a requesting router from the ISP. Meanwhile, many of the > draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd use cases probably expect a subdelegation from > this ISP provided prefix. Nevertheless, an RFC7084 CE Router may also have > a ULA prefix to subdelegate from, and a ULA prefix may be more appropriate > for some of the use cases. Not to mention, there may be prefixes from more > than one ISP or additional prefixes while renumbering. > > Should the delegating router in draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd advertise > subdelegations from all prefixes it may have and let the requesting router > choose one or more? How does the requesting router know which prefixes it > is appropriate to select in what circumstances? If the delegating router > doesn't advertise subdelegations from all prefixes, how does it know which > prefixes to advertise to which requesting routers? > > You can also ask the question from the opposite direction: How does the > requesting router solicit for a ULA prefix instead of a GUA prefix if that > is more appropriate for its use case? > > These questions came to mind while reading draft-ietf-snac-simple, as it > would seem reasonable to want the SCAC router to obtain a ULA prefix from > the delegating router and not a GUA prefix, especially in the scenario > described in A.3. However, similar questions exist for downstream RFC7084 > or PD-per-device in a multi-prefix environment. > > Thanks. > -- > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 > =============================================== > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org >
- [v6ops] DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environment David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ole Trøan
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Timothy Winters
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ole Trøan
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Timothy Winters
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Timothy Winters
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Timothy Winters
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ole Trøan
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… David Farmer
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environme… Daryll Swer