Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 12:46 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC5812D674 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 05:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B30Vt81o6a9p for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 05:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E05D212D62A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 05:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u68Ck0T4017091; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:46:00 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 22182209070; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:46:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C3120905F; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:46:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u68CjxKQ001180; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:45:59 +0200
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org> <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com> <4B8679AA-6FA4-4D9F-A7DD-C8DD6F525EC6@cisco.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5f1127a6-a01f-1395-a04c-0625c55d4176@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:45:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B8679AA-6FA4-4D9F-A7DD-C8DD6F525EC6@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UdWeHHmErXjIIQuyvu8-JQyG6ww>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:46:07 -0000
Fred, Managing power may involve Management Information Base (MIB) which may be expressed as a YANG model. We have just submitted an Internet Draft "YANG model for battery MIB" in the closed eman WG: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petrescu-battery-mib-yang-00 In this model IPv6 does not appear explicitely, but there is a link: YANG modelled MIBs may be queried by SDN tools which in turn may run on IPv6. Our home-brewed SDN tool managing mobile platforms such as smartphones runs fully on IPv6: both data and control planes. We consider JSON but also YANG. Alex Le 01/06/2016 à 18:13, Fred Baker (fred) a écrit : > I personally would find that interesting. As you note, we recently > posted an RFC about managing power by managing activity. Andrew > Yourtchenko has been interested in the chattiness of IPv6 > implementations in WiFi, the issue being that it is a shared medium > (not unlike an Ancient yellow Ethernet cable, and very unlike a > switched network), so every hiccup reverberates throughout the > network. I would expect that the issue affects mobile wireless in > interesting ways. How chatty are we, and what needs to be adjusted? > > Do you have something to share? > >> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:40 AM, Alexandre Petrescu >> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi v6ops, >> >> I wonder whether there may be interest in evaluating the energy >> consumption of an IPv6 application on smartphones, compared to its >> IPv4 counterpart. >> >> I suspect the difference may be negligible but I am not sure. >> >> It would be good to avoid a situation in which the end user prefers >> IPv4 on the smartphone because IPv6 empties the battery. >> >> Alex >> >> Le 11/02/2016 à 20:12, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit : >>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC >>> libraries. >>> >>> BCP 202 RFC 7772 >>> >>> Title: Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements >>> Author: A. Yourtchenko, L. Colitti Status: Best Current >>> Practice Stream: IETF Date: February 2016 Mailbox: >>> ayourtch@cisco.com, lorenzo@google.com Pages: 6 Characters: >>> 12555 See Also: BCP 202 >>> >>> I-D Tag: >>> draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-03.txt >>> >>> URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7772 >>> >>> DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7772 >>> >>> Frequent Router Advertisement messages can severely impact host >>> power consumption. This document recommends operational >>> practices to avoid such impact. >>> >>> This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group >>> of the IETF. >>> >>> >>> BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices >>> for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and >>> suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is >>> unlimited. >>> >>> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist >>> lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >>> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >>> >>> For searching the RFC series, see >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk >>> >>> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either >>> the author of the RFC in question, or to >>> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise >>> on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. >>> >>> >>> The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Alexandre Petrescu
- [v6ops] BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Cons… rfc-editor
- [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 sm… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Adeel Sadiq
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Heatley, Nick
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv… otroan