IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with DISCUSS)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Thu, 22 October 2020 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0873A10D2; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=UyzhMWgw; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=tmxdh0sQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wr1hR65_v8XU; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452483A10D9; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2722; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1603379044; x=1604588644; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=NPj+l48bjcKN14ZilPWIE2M+aN9lxT6VKUijEhUxuW0=; b=UyzhMWgw8mhmIKP00uhcDnX2dlGtcHhIMHAEBWygpAVohzVchTDjlzfc lDeM/uNG6NscVNhqo6dxLDOKuD9YG9w5c7pCXSeQcF7lft8wjMxUDwL7/ z/FfhcuQRmo1Hnz+Rl77drtWeigIi0gcRUY6xFkSFpAtmnSL7FWuesY0I s=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0AZCQBEnpFf/5ldJa1gHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIFPgVJRB4FJLyyEPINJA40pJooQjmqCUwNVCwEBAQ0BAS0CBAEBhEoCF4FyAiU4EwIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVhDIVyAQEBBBIREQwBATcBCwQCAQgOAwMBAgECAiYCAgIfERUICAIEAQ0FIoMEgkwDLgGnbwKBOYhodoEygwQBAQWFAg0LghAJgQ4qgnKDcIZXG4FBP4ERJwwQgk0+ghpCBIFdgxczgiyQMYJnPaNgVAqCapVsBIUJAx+hXo5XhGWNY5JUAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFrI4FXcBVlAYI+UBcCDY4fN4M6ilZ0AjYCBgEJAQEDCXyNTAEB
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:6mbKwBfnJ0mnJkKjDH7upofplGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwaQAdfU7vtFj6zdtKWzEWAD4JPUtncEfdQMUhIekswZkkQmB9LNEkz0KvPmLklYVMRPXVNo5Te3ZE5SHsutaFjbo3n05jkXSV3zMANvLbHzHYjfx828y+G1/cjVZANFzDqwaL9/NlO4twLU48IXmoBlbK02z0jE
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,404,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="561491132"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 Oct 2020 15:03:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09MF3rfE030653 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:03:53 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:03:52 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:03:52 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:03:52 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WtcoHL8S4/MLqlrHtn81xIymLYgFxeqUP9Q0PWzobVBK1bl/e5hK3C9D0ZMi45m+ZbK56ArWuWKAm50L8yQRHRNiH/27lMdPJnmHL0NIwo1jz/Gp3IgpUaljR4PUUa5Q/IIm3PxC0T5OfNyFjxdeeo6hWYX5miizxzjX/J//JsddzF7S22is8ecSbyFvgAUyhsI+Zm5gkrXBSHhq1DlbXtknqRERDNfIvOtLEY/vR+893JZfw6Vk+TQxkG32bJskTKEdaajSu/F9W8jRblQlAZNFnookNwtLjQEN2zdWv8q7jvDJmlbZ7i90LTYWCJXy+Kayhx7t6VXPgCxktxIIww==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NPj+l48bjcKN14ZilPWIE2M+aN9lxT6VKUijEhUxuW0=; b=BpfoClzf6uhSPdPWdAGMEGrxA4vDAzJLMRdwQBPCrull4uvsnAK3QLlH/KVYQZ+KfuBdpdqlzhb7Uj47IHm2N71e2eBsVKsjFfvjYFCFekju/3SPiyjNLJjusLRk8AEPGVCsAp4tE3zrkrGgiWER9ntw1AtBw0GVpOhIq+l7Jwp7KuUA3Ny61la/HUwEaYu/PSHSmGbOhV2dZIVDBh/0tEADLQp+dL5234EoS0naRbPAneRvTo/6xIX7QTGojpfiRcSnzpZERMb5/y9pvQW+tOoBQ8lS2B+EhhQ4/w2247zjBr/dA/adn+gtCP/j/FuBw+gKMAOmelGxHqOvQVoOIw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NPj+l48bjcKN14ZilPWIE2M+aN9lxT6VKUijEhUxuW0=; b=tmxdh0sQwJ/5yxqw5cuzIyGaZ4ig5sS61K0mDY7ZqEgZSeO73Va5EEUAYZNZ6eIcfZhtUegAqQ4QdDr9d8tiip/Wu7Z3Nq8Vc2m70ANHVty5wVQwDAog8pMOpbuaMnDGV9LsbHhY2QqSZpyTSqae5E36qgO+h+NFFpya3PhM4ow=
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:42::21) by PH0PR11MB4776.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:30::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.20; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:03:51 +0000
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d]) by PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.018; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:03:51 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "v6ops-ads@ietf.org" <v6ops-ads@ietf.org>, V6Ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHWqHWxsXy3v5ILPkGL2cjRYWIj26mjonKAgAAFm4CAADGnAA==
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:03:51 +0000
Message-ID: <9F483E75-4C33-4886-AE9F-D2DECDA529C0@cisco.com>
References: <160337261986.9706.15256831018374618832@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr3CiVMHbab+7CK4Jiz3oN5k67CHdJtfEOGPE6QWVWJrZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriUx_hzNB1ssz6xZWFiu-UvqLfs6wb_R=-X0PYxsoK1o4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriUx_hzNB1ssz6xZWFiu-UvqLfs6wb_R=-X0PYxsoK1o4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:7548:2923:aba0:edcf]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fca1b0c0-5428-479a-52d7-08d8769bafb4
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH0PR11MB4776:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH0PR11MB477658518B00A1A8B3205EBAA91D0@PH0PR11MB4776.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: o7m0mdQfjNdwD541hXMnp/9y5RfMC3tBWGTk69Ol7/OCTKzByKFb7LbNis8GEuEgdYCb6V0e+6KAEoRfuz0aH7QJ2YKa7FnETmkZ36U0yKUG+Kc+cE056CxoS2iWpsJFXIMYNND1vNfPUvwTW2fhSsLUYFEml1+ZQQqTW5FUm+kIOhQl8ReRZZtGw361P9C4Kov5gS1OUHcBBOSZYSZW7vy/CcLUKmb2CGPh/vtZxm7Wb4fM3B03HQb4ExUZ9Nu/K6PwmRa8dY8A7MYTB7V9jWqcU4h16/0+3W1jKkIG2Osf16OIKrO05A7unVSXTIt9z0A+OsX3E6MM6w81mH9T7w==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(376002)(366004)(2616005)(8936002)(6506007)(8676002)(110136005)(54906003)(53546011)(71200400001)(316002)(83380400001)(64756008)(66556008)(5660300002)(66946007)(66446008)(91956017)(478600001)(76116006)(33656002)(86362001)(6512007)(2906002)(186003)(66476007)(6486002)(36756003)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: bgfj2hJ3XQvBK1G39xqahAkuV8vz5psUKwJ7L8QXNbr3ZihLzkIMssLZgTkEr4tVAdOFveOH8Qm9ZdwkMmf68TS4573Xu6WbBGljJRXt65C8z1NUnEt86n3ld9BTRiam+3MchLwZahn4Ug7zzPBi1cmndsjaASm97a2q9NLC5LEYdOY5jOIqv1IckqGxPAFzIPycAv/VOKnyhjC1KizqGVus5dRvRjduueD+WdRD1m9gTl7Kk/nW0YnODpazVKv7sBFSPMKOkYm10C2Zu1ydZpYujjs1o4a1BPxnPhZYdJKeGp8Fb23f/4Nmf2eeYa8W3CD+jsQNNYfz27GzJ0Q/2Z9HoIQKwVLEkUUQ9Q3owOwKoCB9fsevtnz4BMatppKyPMN9QKTwOqcBVT+/t/W20rG2JFeA58AXxmnaGppL1jEjokOXjNTPCTeSyObPRQpyrxBdw1bHa0bOVln3XWAmIE44dAUMi3lE0p1GKGu+1epZcLE6Hh0tCTmdgMVKVgkvItbn1TaIHON7Y4kOf8/Zuw6mj2VUT7hJ+mSVT1oysNNGrNlgE20ace3tjsD4HwOxL9LwQchMwVJl+BYnCMvD16aJu0kM8tSbIEw1LQSsDC82PQK2dnnRz3aHej7UG4Wh89aCYF0j+zrWCsPtkJETI1pN0yEgtPLCGnvGDKofhzLjGW+CxToy6AAfeWRdNa/DlzhGwaNh5i64FMBvESm9Rg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <508B330A9A42CB49BF928E5B34281956@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fca1b0c0-5428-479a-52d7-08d8769bafb4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Oct 2020 15:03:51.1848 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rqQlxAPjc7npifBtgr0hz+2yCx7aFn5q6V26jKLyqcxrhtWoWK7RXCM7E4QjJPjtsI55H2VFoXKMD55bdSEX3Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB4776
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Ulh72ZwXPOZFR4oQRj_CAx-RNYE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:04:08 -0000

Same here: going BCP should send the document back to V6OPS, the text quality could be improved a lot by removing 'hand waving' texts that are kind of OK for informational but not for BCP IMHO.

-éric 

-----Original Message-----
From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 22 October 2020 at 16:07
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "v6ops-ads@ietf.org" <v6ops-ads@ietf.org>, V6Ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with DISCUSS)

    On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:46 AM Lorenzo Colitti
    <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    >
    > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:17 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    >>
    >> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
    >> draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: Discuss
    >> [...]
    >> DISCUSS:
    >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>
    >> Let's resolve the document status issue -- it was last-called as Proposed
    >> Standard, it's listed as Informational, but it seems like it should be a BCP.
    >>
    >> I support Rob's DISCUSS and I believe the RFC 8174 boilerplate should be used.
    >
    >
    > I don't think this should be classified as BCP without sending it to the WG for another look. WG consensus was reached on the assumption that the intended status was informational. I suspect many WG participants would have looked at the text with different eyes, and held it to a different/higher standard, if the intended status had been BCP. I know for sure that I would have.

    This (running by the wg again) seems entirely reasonable to me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email