Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share

Jeremy Visser <jeremy@sunriseroad.net> Mon, 22 June 2015 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jeremy@sunriseroad.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3AE1A00E0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfOLioSCxdSz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from azaroth.sunriseroad.net (azaroth.sunriseroad.net [IPv6:2400:8900::f03c:91ff:fe96:40a4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ADB1A00B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 04:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rillian.sunriseroad.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:310c:a800:9957:e22a:c866:bc63]) by azaroth.sunriseroad.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E68E8812A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:45:16 +1000 (AEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sunriseroad.net; s=2015; t=1434973517; bh=ztKke1Mi1d99dDY1nvblJax21HLGuPdO2YyDUmc2yeY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tRCXAR8Kqb9TihmJJUGHbnArjM1B8EjnEJvgTYqdEkPVqmfCN9oXAGwQk76uCdIT1 hf9tzm02iHU1EL2VHoS9cyhDoQk/LJff20SIjZh09f9qfRuLemNjriKiVzvRjfrlCW iD8wrNiPrNQf6S94/qgu/bOyS9ZaJZdKYk837B/4bX0hceyLIQW9bPhR35oAVBUkdS B042c2AqaSMcSyuhcFZ4xTwnesNJbDzGpIB62UYfSkKTgr5eNKdyBwKufIx49Ij+9K JJ0VKcRtqOCclxDHYUNvWvj3WpBPac9L0hyVEEXQIC6TLAQ4nkUCkPeo4qTq28Ap61 t5AiHZOf9iBuQ==
Message-ID: <5587F54A.9050406@sunriseroad.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:45:14 +1000
From: Jeremy Visser <jeremy@sunriseroad.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <5587EFDD.6030807@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5587EFDD.6030807@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/V5GshH3zIhWgNEE2OMuzuqzS9r8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:45:20 -0000

On 22/06/15 21:22, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> It is better to tell the operator to provide a /63 to smartphones (not a
> /64), with DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation.  That will fix it.

Why stop at /63?

If you can think of a use for two subnets, I can think of a use for three.  Or four.  Or sixteen.  Or two hundred and fifty-six...