IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 16 October 2014 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8E71A88A7; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KdBnrukJa_H; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AF71A87A0; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org (xe-0-0-2.transit07.phb1.foobar.org [87.192.56.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9GJpbAm066914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:51:58 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host xe-0-0-2.transit07.phb1.foobar.org [87.192.56.84] claimed to be cupcake.foobar.org
Message-ID: <544021CA.90602@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:51:38 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Enno Rey <erey@ernw.de>, v6ops@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <CAL9jLaZLWG5cKPPhTtLtvn9OQOYwYjdgHCUXsWi3pZJjK+nAbQ@mail.gmail.com> <903173CE-64D6-4FE5-98DB-B408C9586A02@muada.com> <CAL9jLaZiUfb2Pz--nWMq_=DhSz0m4uwDcyPs19PVuq=t6vpyxA@mail.gmail.com> <20141016162257.GH44748@ernw.de> <543FF8C0.9040900@massar.ch> <20141016165306.GA44951@ernw.de>
In-Reply-To: <20141016165306.GA44951@ernw.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/V5UeexFd7uMITBn4pp51Jb034Xw
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:52:10 -0000

On 16/10/2014 17:53, Enno Rey wrote:
> not sure to what extent $RIRs act accordingly (have been involved in
> requesting resources from all five of them in the past and can tell you
> 1st hand that there's quite some encouraging $LARGE_ENTERPRISES to
> become LIRs, in one way or the other). there must be a reason, why - as
> far as I can tell - _pretty much all_ large German companies have joined
> the elitist LIR club in the last two years, preparing their IPv6
> deployment. RIRs are happily playing that game which is exactly why
> debate & consensus are needed (and probably Iljitsch brought this to
> BCOP).
> 
> that said, $FOLK would pay for it. $YOUR_EMPLOYER has a product with "we
> guarantee routing your IPv6 more specifics up to /48 for a monthly $FEE"
> property? Let me know, I'm sure many $FOLKs would be interested in that.
> leaving them "in the dark" and dependent on the goodwill of (my personal
> perspective, based on statistics from RIPE RIS: outdated) strict
> filtering doesn't help anybody.

this whole email ... isn't even wrong.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email