Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sat, 12 September 2020 04:34 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931083A0B7D; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SoUzt6nMtZuh; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60EC43A0B66; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:1088:5583:d414:95e6:ba0f] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:1088:5583:d414:95e6:ba0f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53CC0283B2A; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:34:32 +0000 (UTC)
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "v6ops-chairs@ietf.org" <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <VI1P194MB0285CFA9B82DE9DDDD2F8992AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <463db63e-5249-4976-94ca-2dcf5f89b6fc@si6networks.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 01:33:39 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285CFA9B82DE9DDDD2F8992AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VCtnYCl4hkXlymg_JVtYNYoL3gs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 04:34:39 -0000
Hi, Khaled, As a wg participant, may I ask how IP*v10* would be within the charter/sphere of *v6*ops? Thanks, Fernando On 11/9/20 20:42, Khaled Omar wrote: > Hi Ron, > > Hope my I-D is clear for you, let me ask if we can reserve a slot for the IP-v10 I-D to be discussed during the next coming meeting so we can solve the problem that IMHO became clear for everyone even students. > > Good Luck, > > Khaled Omar > > -----Original Message----- > From: Khaled Omar > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:56 PM > To: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 > > Hi V6OPS WG, > > Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06 > > Best Regards, > > Khaled Omar > > -----Original Message----- > From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Meeting Session Request Tool > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:52 PM > To: session-request@ietf.org > Cc: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org > Subject: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 > > > > A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group. > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations > Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Fred Baker > > > Number of Sessions: 1 > Length of Session(s): 2 Hours > Number of Attendees: 100 > Conflicts to Avoid: > Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr > > Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg tsvarea panrg grow tsvwg > > > > > > People who must be present: > Fred Baker > Ron Bonica > Warren "Ace" Kumari > > Resources Requested: > > Special Requests: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for I… IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Simon Hobson
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Lencse Gábor
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Lencse Gábor
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Ola Thoresen
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Ola Thoresen
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Wilhelm Boeddinghaus
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Wilhelm Boeddinghaus
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar