Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT in wireless home broadband
Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 15:14 UTC
Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8985A1204C2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLnyrdJ9uuJy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12c.google.com (mail-it1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E781204AF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id w15so6653924itc.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aMWnufrbrFgj3lDNsnELwmgU2z5sXjcD4wd9o6l7NtE=; b=mcoT6mM+KC6asWQgQlhI/EBItfOH036mSQCZ2dST3mOfXb15KzGMeClTVgps02C0PU kJpXUdSRCR8Ouig6eM3cyt9Y0xbOONSqYrMs06zUj8mttl9MQBmezRVmAUT/H2tyn7u9 VygJxoyt6IQHgQiQNkF1CKQyqzJfXHu6o1on4dDCw5G0++Avo9V6nW9uwwbkS+iXYUI3 cI+Pb2QeIXmtVpG/kjARcVhzTLF0tB1dgwGty5GeVr3XPSy5dPJh+/NraY593zJdjrh9 wtD3qnCmzw6zpOw8ms/f4lz5a8nSe8YtcZ/88Cujt0R/ZI3Olmz7aev6nYXuUwwpaJBx iXUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aMWnufrbrFgj3lDNsnELwmgU2z5sXjcD4wd9o6l7NtE=; b=JzrvMx1gSTzNimQd8U1/1+xtWiSnPD+LrgyCd/2HBhdSUlgqKHoFt/dl5zdD1IlpoP +aS7Q3c7FMDpITmJAtfYJm9f58Huu9PsLtlwwRGfIbHnifJoowtrzcG0S4kSnkYDQvy+ ACmSnVSQY9YMxtFcGRKMVNZu5G3aFP9kcUzBlaKApoH2g1R79fPhCcYNDuUh8sRMFZs/ /AxWqymNCkPJYQJriLnu3uK0WTbkSS5y9h2EPZj8e1ClsNJ4pxg2VA9eI6UCtjHIUTX5 oB4q2qon2fV85D7fsb9oUrTOwV+r6hbOhRsyBYj3AYcio9Xb6xRzXTZqv+lw1+pGQvr3 p0RQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkT/gz+7EVvznFtpTvj7QE+W6btiJjNZAK/40K4t1p7O0ggK04 +ATUjcTlatLPOw+MRRrs6WcRWu+3T4l8/DSZ3aHyOQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxSfzBruZXrLpBSHghtKsKu02ZmEmIi8ehpBIlmFpcRMH/FvftnATgk2Xd6jbdco6/k6QoYa7ZyrcmWqPREK8=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:2a88:: with SMTP id w130mr402861itw.95.1553786043312; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD6AjGR-cZi47-uurwcxeh9UG9opRRUwTFsz2nj6xg=_FcKMng@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3uW0Cu=CJjHfj_KTUM2=vU2zhR2jE2fjGLkfcvX=7d2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3uW0Cu=CJjHfj_KTUM2=vU2zhR2jE2fjGLkfcvX=7d2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:13:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGRoecd6R6Zxb4Ne6OnqQK+w+7YmTK3=_pU9f3Ww=xaJiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b311905852901c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VP6G2L1VX9wm-mmTicHdk6Mn2MA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT in wireless home broadband
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:14:14 -0000
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:01 AM Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote: > Heh. 464xlat is pretty much the worst transition mechanism, but hey, IPv4 > is legacy, so... > Vint Cerf took the blame for ipv4 being poorly designed — “it was only an experiment”. Fortunately, the Reddit people say that the ipv6 is unencumbered. I will note that rfc7278 is also in use, aka 64share. RA pref64 is fine, i support. Perhaps it will be included in 6G or 7G. As we know, IETF first. > BTW, thoughts on > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pref64folks-6man-ra-pref64-02 ? Seems > to fit very well with this sort of thing. > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:00 AM Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just FYI since people in this group may be interested in on-going ipv6 >> deployments. Also, i am not a spokesperson for anyone. >> >> According to Reddit (which you may not cite for your end to term homework >> assignment), T-Mobile US has launched a 464XLAT LTE home broadband product. >> T-Mobile’s handset portfolio has been 100% 464xlat (or similar) for a few >> years now, so not surprising that architecrure is being reused in the home >> context. >> >> >> >> https://www..reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/b66f15/home_internet_kit_has_arrived_and_setup_and_using/?sort=new >> <https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/b66f15/home_internet_kit_has_arrived_and_setup_and_using/?sort=new> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >> >