Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984321A1BB4; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j3cNmpnda6s1; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C45F31A1BA9; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id lf12so2792579vcb.17 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hvkL3deYj8F2qyrWFvLwOeD/vC2Xu8FjEE33zT1EPpE=; b=p8QYnSv9eXn2wRvghj9LwUuzjA6b/ckQ2xhcKhmEn+PnQbHJdHBxh2cdZf+AUpU31F EvnEc7RaC5jwOuPefzirMf2qWZhwVUOEgh9aa/7ZJzl8k979vBrEcnSyG6ey9B645fB9 8LQrSYQXr2AobODHVJsx8jSfwZda57MGOpqcSTCb5jzss9ClYVcVgzxTtjgvlFFsQvku tN23vn+7qUHC/MgGNOQQaIM6O46lWYCB0kaO6utp1S/CE7ygXg/NmqmUNpx9R+Yko/Zk EjX7lrYOG1QQt5tFQ3xEY5ehUYAkP2DAozyEf2cOisv0tXtnsnpO5x2KX5wK+mq0VOba x6Ow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.34.42 with SMTP id w10mr1194665vdi.57.1413470723927; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.186.193 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20141016143743.GC31092@Space.Net>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <CAL9jLaZLWG5cKPPhTtLtvn9OQOYwYjdgHCUXsWi3pZJjK+nAbQ@mail.gmail.com> <903173CE-64D6-4FE5-98DB-B408C9586A02@muada.com> <CAL9jLaZiUfb2Pz--nWMq_=DhSz0m4uwDcyPs19PVuq=t6vpyxA@mail.gmail.com> <20141016143743.GC31092@Space.Net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:45:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaYvN3vthmcKNmBj-q+puWkuEdWf=2cfWBCTUXV9j=g_Wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VX6iCCdG0dK_f4Kc_kJqgRxCnlE
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:45:26 -0000
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:11:41AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> So, some folk thought: "Hey, not announcing my aggregate and not >> providing connectivity between the aggregate announcement and the >> little islands I created is a grand plan!" and were surprised when >> things went badly... >> >> Do you want a document that says: >> "Sure, announce your aggregate as a bunch of de-aggs, and be sure >> there's a fall back ASIDE FROM ::/0 which has reachability to your >> islands, if you want to be sure to not run afoul of random isp route >> filtering." > > A strong message to that extent would be good :-) - coupled with > some recommendations how the conflicting goals ("I want all ISPs in > my neighbourhood to use optimal routing" vs. "someone in Asia might > not be interested in all in 5k routes for german municipality") > could be solved. > ok, perhaps iljitsch can drop some text into a document so we can get a good read going and decide whether or not GROW wants to spend cycles on it? The problem exists in v4 and v6 and likely will persist in whatever comes next. It's directly related to routing operations work on the global intertubes, so it SEEMS like GROW is the 'right place' to discuss this... we can't go anywhere without text and a draft though. > I get that question fairly often from "largish networks", and so far, > I always have to answer "there is no routing police, so it's hard to > say what is allowed on the Internet and what not" - which is a humorous > way to say "there is no consensus here what consists 'good' and > 'responsible'"... I sort of don't want there to be 'routing police' though :( In a way this whole debate sounds like something a 'cisco training class' (or other example) would have covered, or should cover. I suppose it's fairly experiential at this point though.
- [v6ops] Deaggregation by large organizations Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] Deaggregation by large organizations Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [v6ops] Deaggregation by large organizations Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Enno Rey
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Enno Rey
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Russ White
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Enno Rey
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Matthew Petach
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Matthew Petach
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Christopher Morrow
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Randy Bush
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Marc Binderberger
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data (was: Deagg… Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] renumbering [was Deaggregation by large o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Matthew Petach
- Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organiz… Iljitsch van Beijnum