Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Sun, 21 January 2018 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9D7129C56 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 04:48:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ss-OqsuV4Lcs for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 04:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2498E127869 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 04:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120DD4A; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:48:40 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1516538916; bh=b26dUonTAkYobWKnEwR CHN6n01K5Ac8hQDOHC+Xa1VE=; b=aKfs8cMTB+yRzIdDRW+8N0yX4uuWTp9HpXO 7lQ5kMulpyGd+BVy8QC1Iyfhn6rc12t7jAPLwCC8qQutmu99ewMUyzApFgDYMaLJ VceExjDrt+JBWeD5lX0a/Q/qHeLH+2HOgZiWfu1lw+RtiWGJbtikNmCPOXsQdV0A f3NBBLKk=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AES8ElXePtFi; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:48:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a301:1000:59e6:6a08:263f:e494] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a301:1000:59e6:6a08:263f:e494]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D71B49; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:48:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <0D7FF435-BA8B-40CF-AAC9-4B96F76D058E@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4A757A1F-4E67-4AFC-AD1E-858B207AC324"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:48:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A6995969-0C03-4261-92F4-331206825130@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>, v6ops@ietf.org
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <D687BC24.92CC1%lee@asgard.org> <A6995969-0C03-4261-92F4-331206825130@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/VYYxNEXSqFzkAjOtG-ECsx62Vis>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 12:48:46 -0000

Hi Fred,

I think this one is the wrong way around:

>  - for scenarios in which IPv6 islands are connected across IPv4 space, use dslite (a tunneling design).

DS-Lite connects IPv4 islands over IPv6 infra, and 6rd connects IPv6 islands over IPv4 infra.

Cheers!
Sander