Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Wed, 13 October 2021 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92D33A0BE9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOPWEP-bm8TB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71FBE3A0BF1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HV2m84bN1z9vK1b for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:34:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GWt9MG3I7Ugo for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:34:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f198.google.com (mail-yb1-f198.google.com [209.85.219.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HV2m82PMzz9vK1H for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:34:32 -0500 (CDT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mta-p6.oit.umn.edu 4HV2m82PMzz9vK1H
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mta-p6.oit.umn.edu 4HV2m82PMzz9vK1H
Received: by mail-yb1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b197-20020a2534ce000000b005b71a4e189eso4395153yba.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F0+dGGo2aWjNuZxrGgfjxJ9X/rLyswadnFB9t51dZ9Y=; b=CYWdXT54doV2pCQ18+zmnqbC0rnOOaJkgXW4uM7Qfm9lTTLB0tm4JPsLK5Aks1yGsl YRe4jHynL0QrcGxOEXOv5b6vhq5KkOzARcn9eFQ9vkTSmPgPhIoeSXXf6iY/HBvDpODp nL3kUKNceWLa/XBfDy9/HqMfE+kZtBYyajrutmIBIGMZeyZqv6N7QJR2KA+JKDhxSdER xjUyz8FhWORo89VeRKGVd+HWETUqe+0l12Zch2CsWvrpOhJ4fJ4OuRu1skZn2p9PYxC/ Ohu09Ojc8rTm3sc1vMkA7IFfUO5+Nh+UjxvPk4q8ZpEwi2k2Nd0P/P3kYgf56D5H1S6p 5jZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F0+dGGo2aWjNuZxrGgfjxJ9X/rLyswadnFB9t51dZ9Y=; b=zHzPbMj2DeIikI3fKmDyNsRXAH3nTjVYdQBymmgpW8QvJSmPCzIWMcdrq2Vm21ikT0 49IdqPXiMk2iuGhYV6LKX5XtOjE+3wmAadazSKIFORuphlMRbyWsl2DPnZ1fEIesOO5T vvbVE08MWC9joftHgz3sr27D6TiQimw6KCioVlpYCkithIY8XR/X66L88Q1zpUcsRrvb c4QYRYdTEBG5lXbywXYWDaCId0imBa5FPn9WjR+AMavggEmCx4OLtNKIqCPZEMVHkiBB kSwvtixp7XyjHvj0r8xVGw9UzHs5l5sXsy0JISN23ZCGHaEDZ9mOsvyYEZYpBQdPE0vt N/Zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AuFq1irX3Gr8xVmu//lfyIQvZrzbYI/4OOCRE6zz5dPP4gPqb Xs1v4IG26DD8RfFKuPcWrhRVNpyz3wclGfrEwN+CKMjiUG8v7W28gBVbkbvjkRBsSlvWvLSgARx r09EwMkdqTwosjyv8GebLcgLQUQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d258:: with SMTP id j85mr1606925ybg.398.1634153671412; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhoyVOMle0TZZaIcsaxJIe6MydEP3er6A+pq6QcxsitzGxoCYI63QC4WwIUgeHkG35RrDdcLgpS+dlTxxotuA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d258:: with SMTP id j85mr1606883ybg.398.1634153670990; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1A6ED87B-666E-439C-852F-2E5C904C0515@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr23fY2DJDvB-9eVFRsxnBnZQ0kZuZfYUfRUHYW=_D=enA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1z0q0R61x7iY+Wg_cFRU0jmqr+fR0y=bSXxj+K-n722w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1T_mXfxJGHOrBfqZfexm6GTrUqnFi57710pTroKQK6uQ@mail.gmail.com> <702CB018-1A02-4B32-B9AA-7C7B31521F12@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr0jZR8Efzr_Y6FeiBvHYS8ATmDupx2ABTXXy-rSA_QjmA@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB69249D4F0A8003E77EC9F153C3B19@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAN-Dau0q7p-9NWv=9vouX51Z1Yqe_h06WwpnkMjkyj6=A7EcQw@mail.gmail.com> <m1mZfPJ-0000IoC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CADzU5g7z2eQAfa2F4yJb512UGVNVz=7q5ne565XEmb1bztJNeQ@mail.gmail.com> <YWcZ8ROAmbjVLNUJ@Space.Net> <421CFA29-B8CB-4714-8E0B-1713E979015D@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <421CFA29-B8CB-4714-8E0B-1713E979015D@delong.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:34:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau247p5+4pg0FRqMySkTmjANdwPSRU8k5sxhGc_Le_KyXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Owen Delong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Clark Gaylord <cgaylord@vt.edu>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011789805ce410dc9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/W3LA19DsQYO6CW1O3jWPrJwYxlU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:34:40 -0000

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:58 PM Owen DeLong wrote:

>
> > On Oct 13, 2021, at 10:40 , Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 05:04:39PM -0400, Clark Gaylord wrote:
> >> The predictability of assigned/managed addresses is less a problem for
> your
> >> arbitrary client/phone and more of an issue for the potential use case,
> for
> >> example, of IoT/instrumentation devices where the endpoints are
> perceived
> >> to need more active management than the typical phone.
> >
> > And this is a typical role for an Android mobile device?
>
> A lot of IOT development is using android as a base OS, yes.
>
> Mobile device? Not necessarily, but lots of IoT with WiFi or Ethernet only
> interfaces
> do use android as a base OS.
>
> > And this is so important that a general purpose mobile device can not do
> > IA_NA/IA_TA, because some special-purpose IoT hub would need something
> > else?
>
> I think he’s arguing that android should do IA_NA/IA_TA not only because
> of the
> situations that desire it for general purpose mobile devices, but also
> because
> it’s even more important for IOT things that are being built on the
> android platform.
>
> I could be wrong, Clark can certainly correct me if I misunderstood his
> concern.
>
> Owen
>

I can speak for Clark, but IOT and other things that are not general
purpose mobile devices are what I'm thinking about.

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================