IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 28 September 2021 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690933A0A07 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xT4yNbVRbiH0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3AE3A0A00 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1632854395; x=1664390395; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pmNxjC70C96GEeyE8JJtmQ3tydhcXKlax0po2xt7gKQ=; b=L7Jfc2bS/Z4wtq/r2uf3ZFYQ5dL4i86epNmbGVK7vWp7xfXxkcCp0bO3 c50GR1snfTpoJ0BKz5tu2x1DQdzhEQMumvjQ3D9Gjrs82sGXB1y6wUwBg /IFcwlUlG5kn9R1zefG1fKcOIl+QpB/Sng5OcD+RRwTEL9aPG+n+RaXLs olFeFIsDQbGXjDSTRW6ZDp283exER23qV0jle7HxkUKB7N6sBhbKjN89I lA8hraZPQS1QPwDr+ykdUtynZ6GdWt5op8QESQ+RuG96zIBvI4U9OZfyM En7tD0367Hd3aYzI9ssh6gs7+jwx/eS19/JjutxPurUQvfU6eo6A9NTeu w==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Sep 2021 20:39:51 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D4241930 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383CF41202; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 30F6B10FA83; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:39:50 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: 'V6 Ops List' <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YVNhdioAbeO9p2/G@Space.Net>
References: <6E95834D-12B3-447B-8326-8EDE9DC6FFB1@delong.com> <CAO42Z2zA-4cK489nxKsWUN8vvU0eAiz-jS0e-_eWPg+OmP8wLw@mail.gmail.com> <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com> <CAO42Z2wdoSdJDOB2Zo0=ZK0ecOARRsdg2nbHZGSDOhryPbLfDw@mail.gmail.com> <F2BD0A42-E9AD-45DD-999A-638E73BE1177@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2K3Gd3JD=NJFOoH6GYgs-8ACxRQB9-sKJ7cbF4_hxsow@mail.gmail.com> <0B533C71-5DB0-410D-A5A3-7E8FD559F214@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3NoYfNT7+OVJoCCdgdif6AHHw29tNCPttS=-NuRZKv3w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB692426B0EEDDC2C4D78D8EC0C3A89@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <EFC78F4B-873B-42EE-8DC5-04C29758B0D0@consulintel.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EFC78F4B-873B-42EE-8DC5-04C29758B0D0@consulintel.es>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/W4C6zFyCq5rDL5JAuEypvfHCfEA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:40:00 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 06:24:57PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I don???t think I can agree with your comments about recommending not deploying in enterprise (and thus government) networks.
> 
> In fact, I think it is key for advancing the IPv6 deployment that governments require it in any administration network including any acquisitions (hardware, software, services, links, etc.). That encourages the ecosystem to move on to IPv6, including enterprises that want to participate in government tenders.

As a matter of fact, I know of at least one deployment in a "fortune 500"
company that was seriously impaired due to lack of DHCPv6 support in
Android.  They want control over address assignment, tracking of address
assignments, and DHCP is the machinery they use for it (plus NAC, making
sure that only assigned IPv6 addresses can be used).

But they want to support Android devices.

So, still no IPv6 today...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email