Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share

[Vízdal Aleš <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 2:19 PM
> To: Vízdal Aleš; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
>
>
>
> Le 01/07/2015 11:35, Vízdal Aleš a écrit :
> >> -----Original Message----- From: v6ops
> >> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
> >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:16 PM To:
> >> [e-mail]; [e-mail] Subject: Re: [v6ops]
> >> Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 29/06/2015 14:51, [e-mail] a écrit :
> >
> >> The modem and chipsets on LTE that I have tried do forward DHCPv6
> >> requests.  For example it transmits the DHCPv6 Request and then
> >> receives an DHCPv6 Ack from the cellular network containing an IPv6
> >> address.  But if I make a DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation request then that
> >> is not answered.
> >
> > The current 3GPP specs do not contain DHCPv6 based IPv6 prefix
> > allocation, so I would be surprised by an LTE network doing so.
>
> 'Prefix Allocation' or Prefix Delegation?   Because Section 5.3.1.2.6.
> or this 3GPP/ETSI spec does tell DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation, between the LTE
> network and the UE.

Initial Prefix Allocation (/64), I am not talking about PD.

> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123400_123499/123401/10.03.00_60/ts
> _123401v100300p.pdf
>
> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123400_123499/123401/12.06.00_60/ts
> _123401v120600p.pdf
>
> (in this way one can see the history of it).
>
> > The DHCPv6 server could be run by the dongle and providing that RA
> > provided prefix via DHCPv6 to the host.
>
> If that is a question, the answer is no, the DHCPv6 server is not running by the
> dongle, because the IP address provided by DHCP is different than the IP
> address formed from the RA: both the prefix and the IID.
>
> The DNS server provided by RA is different than the DNS server provided by
> DHCP.  The DNS server provided by DHCP works fine whereas the one provided
> by RA does not work.  (So I end up with a situation where I must use both
> DHCP and RA, which is a burden)

It looks that the dongle is acting as a router then.

> After having queried the operator in question I continue to think DHCPv6-PD is
> not provided by the network, although DHCPv6 for addresses _is_.
>
> Alex

Ales


Zásady komunikace, které společnost T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. užívá při sjednávání smluv, jsou uvedeny zde<http://www.t-mobile.cz/dcpublic/Zasady_komunikace_pri_sjednavani_smluv_cz.pdf>. Není-li v zásadách uvedeno jinak, nepředstavuje tato zpráva konečný návrh na uzavření či změnu smlouvy ani přijetí takového návrhu. The communication principles which T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. applies when negotiating contracts are defined here<http://www.t-mobile.cz/dcpublic/Zasady_komunikace_pri_sjednavani_smluv_en.pdf>. Unless otherwise stated in the principles, this message does not constitute the final offer to contract or an amendment of a contract or acceptance of such offer.