Re: [v6ops] RFC 7278 on Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Mobile Interface to a LAN Link

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 17 February 2016 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4534B1A702C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:25:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKNwA3op0Slg for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5501A700F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u1HFPI8j008629 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:25:18 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B2E0D2080A4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:33:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B68208046 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:33:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u1HFPI7s011013 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:25:18 +0100
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <20140626205546.713F21801AE@rfc-editor.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56C490DE.8000406@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:25:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20140626205546.713F21801AE@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/WJqXM7ou0gaaEl5FeYbSwnm0Od8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC 7278 on Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Mobile Interface to a LAN Link
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:25:22 -0000

Hi,

I have a comment on this RFC7278.

The comment comes from the observation that the operator also uses an 
address from the 64share prefix (a global address).

As such that address too should not be used in the 'LAN'.

This may lead to several textual modifications to the document.  For 
example:
> R-2: The UE MUST defend all of its IPv6 addresses on the LAN link.

This is wrongly stated, because the UE does not own that prefix, so it 
can't say "its IPv6 addresses".  That prefix is belonging to a link not 
to the UE, because the operator also makes an address out of it.

Alex

Le 26/06/2014 22:55, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit :
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
>          RFC 7278
>
>          Title:      Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from
>                      a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)
>                      Mobile Interface to a LAN Link
>          Author:     C. Byrne,
>                      D. Drown,
>                      A. Vizdal
>          Status:     Informational
>          Stream:     IETF
>          Date:       June 2014
>          Mailbox:    cameron.byrne@t-mobile.com,
>                      dan@drown.org,
>                      ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz
>          Pages:      10
>          Characters: 19965
>          Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>
>          I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-10.txt
>
>          URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7278.txt
>
> This document describes requirements for extending an IPv6 /64 prefix
> from a User Equipment Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)
> radio interface to a LAN link and describes two implementation
> examples.
>
> This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.
>
>
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>    http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>    http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>
> For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>
>
>