IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 24 July 2015 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0D11A1A52 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLflnx1e6h3K for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7441C1A0A85 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0E375A1; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:32:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1437726725; bh=WC4lmCRK9XQY9NsgKrazZZpWkoqfAiUvuprxMaIzF/Q=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uqUYqCNmh+4i6nlCN3TSwo0MTYuBIEHIHgvLthyKqeFp2SPUur1DE9syonsTlKY9j tut7oVXjCJn2B91LkMHrq9bJvgyWRl7SZTPUSLFuePDweDdLo9BCWnH2HZztRICrMy 0FcwIWB170I5bieLVdqYN2dlxw4urhrL4Ke1BKTI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E759F; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:32:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:32:05 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132A90D2D@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507241028300.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132A90D2D@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/WM6un7d8RGlx_uArN6deUZldrbI>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:32:17 -0000

On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, STARK, BARBARA H wrote:

> I think this would be a reasonable use of a ULA.

I would not use ULA, since this is "special" in RFC6724. I would like to 
get something that ends up under the ::/0 label according to RFC6724.

> A PI might be even better. I hear PIs are pretty easy to come by. The PI 
> would have the advantage of being known to come from an Apple device for 
> this NAT64 purpose. That could help with trouble shooting.

Yes, I agree that PI would be optimal, but I am not opposed to using some 
other prefix such as the one Stuart suggested.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email