Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

[Ole Troan <[e-mail]>]

> On 3 Feb 2019, at 20:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Agree. Just wanted to clarify that assertion, as I've heard it too many times.
> 
> AVM/Fritzbox, if I recall correctly is one of the very very very few vendors that write the prefix in the flash ...

And just to be clear. That’s of course not the only solution. Nor necessarily the right solution. 

Ole
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>
> Fecha: domingo, 3 de febrero de 2019, 20:41
> Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>
> CC: "[e-mail] WG" <[e-mail]>, 6man WG <[e-mail]>
> Asunto: Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
> 
>>    On 2019-02-04 06:46, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>>    The RIPE document does not recommend it. In Germany, that's the expected
>>    default.
>> 
>> ---->  This is not correct, in the context of another mailing list, a few day ago, some people (including people from Germany) confirmed that this is not true for Germany, neither there is any law or anything similar that requires dynamic prefixes.
> 
>    It doesn't matter. The objective fact is that getting a new prefix after a CPE reboot, or after a DSL disconnect/reconnect, or every 24 hours, is common, and not just in Germany.
> 
>    Not that I've ever had any stale address problems as a result, even at a time when I was getting multiple ADSL disconnects per day due to a line fault. So with a FritzBox and Windows hosts, the "common problem" simply wasn't a problem.
> 
>       Brian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops