IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience-05.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF2D1AE2D4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:58:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9U3K-00Mjli for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E931AE2D3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id tp5so5995792ieb.22 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:58:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=mjuXJHA1IxMAxhIpDsaYTYMErsL4WpR+0t2uxjH7WZI=; b=e1UPyD/SVo7cFgY+pCQdUThyECHiLiU7ZAbp/Ol3VCIc5UBB8LP2bLs1/u5sIjM8Mw PwMj+lt7PEZ7/SnLZTd9Al6TuvAF4ypezQz18QIhCGijsgcX4BiJ0F3qCy6EuBtYQ1/F JbBnpDGxh4hrTW3Y+sWEZ+ANXWMq4xv6yROqag/I6N2YikEpdX6adw+TyPNTCAxWTz4X AJupI4VFVxcTtwkOb2Ib5+MOIGzZC5PQrIp+V+TNH7UwUZQl9G3rKea5aWg0lwM2mgfc VREVBkO730o0hkBVea7iUX4hKYk9+t9NlMJVVESBWMrHvslOVg87BTtmsLUZzKuXTjIx Lluw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=mjuXJHA1IxMAxhIpDsaYTYMErsL4WpR+0t2uxjH7WZI=; b=Of2agIdJiUZcRmqCAQWCiCQVSkvTFNR8RfimYI5ixL0AbWjjHwK10AYCqqkQg0CRwH ARgUPQswga8H+LoBLfGBtPV7VNh+Ci2juix/s+AVeXz3Fe6w3P6/kXV6WMdJ+4Agq5yv eUuIDQS6EehEpUiSw7Bm4BLk9o1Nqm4HvxH/bQ4qhqytQUEUGjsJB6IXLoUxojTb3YiR DJIUNuWNyHDvV+5Rdiy6jW7wtl7Du1/4qdg3NVGDItao6gW9sM15zLNRXYA7tTjTP7Sw Zkioqvpey4gYzAiSbVm+L93+qBjbRt/7nDweLDARhi811OSYut3RbysP7pnRsA8jPEl+ ZCWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/Mxjl1GSjGCyP9PBaLwagiFvIQkBCk0n73zEbeTM5QwNsNw8vBP8ClcqJT9vcsm1ByeRuvw+mGFNLfaE7As2ia1JBvsHssdYmkjC3mgR9fGRC4ToroPQnfPaHGWKI7y+7XW+1zfh8li3eOeh69O6oySfiVPVBAh1ZN7rV5Fs/xrEtsamdW64EvywD+v4lw5aMk/k8
X-Received: by 10.50.41.38 with SMTP id c6mr13188018igl.47.1387180716603; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:58:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:58:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7468AC73-6B83-41A3-B961-A815443CF6D6@cisco.com>
References: <20131209033734.26917.18115.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <39690BB5-A194-4C11-B6EE-9EE51B46F966@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr2mVeXO+fx5vf+vvo7ML9ALztkbCP-BY+h+07nyue6NiA@mail.gmail.com> <7468AC73-6B83-41A3-B961-A815443CF6D6@cisco.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:58:16 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr10TBrkRTdKhEH1jo61rgXff=c9UaKS529Z9_iweQxk=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0117689fda607b04eda22d34"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience-05.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:58:41 -0000

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> True for normative references; this is informative, which the argument
> doesn't hold for.
>
> The statement in the draft is
>
>    Unique Local Addresses (ULAs) are defined in [RFC4193] to be
>    renumbered within a network site for local communications.  Operators
>    may use ULAs as NAT64 prefixes to provide site-local IPv6
>    connectivity.  Those ULA prefixes are stripped when the packets going
>    to the IPv4 Internet, therefore ULAs are only valid in the IPv6 site.
>    The use of ULAs could help in identifying the translation
>    traffic.[I-D.ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations] has provided
>    further guidance for the ULAs usages.
>
> what, specifically, is your objection?
>

I was referring to the text "[I-D.ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations] has
provided
   further guidance for the ULAs usages.". That document is not an RFC yet,
and I thought that it was inappropriate to cite it from other RFCs. If
you're saying that's not an issue, then that's fine.

That said, I think the document shouldn't say "has provided further
guidance" because we don't yet know what guidance will be. If anything it
should say "provides further guidance".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email